Abstract 2859
Background
FOLFOXIRI + bev is regarded as a valuable option in the first-line tx of mCRC pts. A possible concern for the adoption is the feasibility and efficacy of tx after progression, and especially the reintroduction of the same agents used upfront. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of tx after progression among pts treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI + bev in the phase III TRIBE (NCT00719797) and TRIBE2 (NCT02339116) studies. The impact of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan free interval (OIFI), defined as the time from the last administration of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to disease progression, on the efficacy of tx after progression was also investigated.
Methods
Data about tx received after progression including 2ndPFS (i.e. the time from 2nd line tx start to disease progression or death) were collected. The efficacy of tx after progression according to the duration of the OIFI was explored. A cut-off value of 4 months was adopted.
Results
Out of 586 pts treated with upfront FOLFOXIRI + bev, 520 progressed. Among 409 (79%) pts who received a tx after progression, 168 (41%) received FOLFOXIRI ± bev (Group A) and 241 (59%) received other tx (Group B), including FOLFOX or FOLFIRI ± bev or other agents not used in first line in 124 and 117 cases, respectively. Anti-EGFR moAbs were administered in 68 cases.
Pts in Group A experienced significantly longer 2nd PFS than pts in Group B (median 2nd PFS: 6.1 vs 4.2, HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.62-0.94; p = 0.012). Pts with an OIFI ≥ 4 mos (n = 279) had longer 2nd PFS than those with an OIFI < 4 mos (n = 130) independently of the second-line tx (6.1 vs 3.7 mos: HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.42-0.69; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of pts with an OIFI ≥ 4 mos FOLFOXIRI ± bev (n = 125) was associated with longer 2nd PFS compared to other tx (n = 154) (7.2 vs 5.5 mos; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.029). Conversely, in pts with an OIFI < 4 mos no significant difference was shown between Group A (n = 43) and B (n = 87) (4.4 vs 3.2; HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.65-1.36; p = 0.75).
Conclusions
Tx after progression to first-line FOLFOXIRI + bev were feasible. Pts with longer OIFI showed better 2nd PFS and seemed to derive more benefit from the reintroduction of the triplet.
Clinical trial identification
TRIBE NCT00719797 TRIBE2 NCT02339116.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
G.O.N.O.: Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S. Lonardi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier. D. Santini: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck. A. Falcone: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Servier. C. Cremolini: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2840 - Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Android:Gynoid Fat Ratio in Breast Cancer Survivors
Presenter: Christina Dieli-Conwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
869 - Impact of Education for Breast self examination in Rural Indian Women on Early Detection - results of POC study
Presenter: Sneha Parchuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1951 - Breast cancer incidence and survival in renal transplant patients: 35-year experience
Presenter: Michalis Kontos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2017 - The changing landscape of breast cancer incidence after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease
Presenter: Amelia Benjamin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1780 - Number of deliveries as a prognostic factor in different breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Anniina Jääskeläinen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4650 - Effects of supervised and adapted exercise program in the quality of life and strength of breast cancer survivors: MAMA MOVE Gaia trial
Presenter: Ana Joaquim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4962 - Study On the Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Affecting the Proportion of Breast Conserving Surgery in Chinese Women Breast Cancer
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5451 - Clinical decision making and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in early breast cancer. Is the agreement between planned and applied therapeutic program?
Presenter: Marco Giavarra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
888 - The value of genetic counselling in breast cancer genetic testing and clinical management
Presenter: Vicki Kiesel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4005 - Elderly patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry
Presenter: Masataka Sawaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract