Abstract 5239
Background
ALK inhibitors (ALKi) have shown substantial benefit in pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. We describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC in the US.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilised US electronic health record data from Flatiron Health. Pts diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV ALK+ NSCLC from 1 Jan 2011 to 30 Sep 2018 were included. Treatment patterns and outcomes (real-world progression-free survival [rwPFS] and overall survival [OS]) were extracted for first- or second-line therapy. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD) was used as a surrogate for real-world treatment duration accounting for treatment beyond progression. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Data were available for 620 pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC. An ALKi was given to 420/620 (67.7%) pts as first-line therapy and 273/359 (76.0%) pts who received second-line therapy. Among non-ALKi treatments, platinum-based regimens were the most common. Crizotinib was the preferred first-line ALKi up to 2016, and then alectinib. As second-line therapy, crizotinib was the preferred ALKi up to 2013, followed by ceritinib from 2014–2015, and then alectinib to the end of the follow-up period. TTTD, rwPFS and OS were longest with alectinib, followed by crizotinib and non-ALKi (Table).Table:
1546P
1L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 98) | Ceritinib (n = 4) | Crizotinib (n = 318) | non-ALKi (n = 200) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 5.06 (0.72, NR) | 6.41 (5.92, 8.16) | 8.26 (6.25, 9.9) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.55 (0.49, 0.6) | 0.59 (0.52, 0.66) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.32 (0.27, 0.38) | 0.37 (0.3, 0.44) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 7.57 (6.97, 9.14) | 3.12 (2.76, 4.38) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.92) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.61 (0.56, 0.67) | 0.35 (0.29, 0.43) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.73 (0.64, 0.84) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.36 (0.31, 0.42) | 0.21 (0.16, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 23.06 (16.51, 30.86) | 27.99 (21.6, 36.51) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.78 (0.73, 0.82) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.65 (0.6, 0.7) | 0.71 (0.65, 0.78) | ||
2L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 90) | Ceritinib (n = 75) | Crizotinib (n = 97) | non-ALKi (n = 86) |
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | 13.59 (10.33, NR) | 6.32 (4.64, 8.45) | 6.88 (4.9, 9.87) | 4.4 (2.96, 6.81) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.76 (0.68, 0.86) | 0.51 (0.4, 0.64) | 0.54 (0.45, 0.65) | 0.4 (0.31, 0.52) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.55 (0.44, 0.68) | 0.25 (0.16, 0.37) | 0.35 (0.26, 0.46) | 0.22 (0.14, 0.33) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | 19.84 (14.54, NR) | 8.19 (6.22, 11.84) | 8.72 (7.37, 5.36) | 4.61 (3.42, 6.18) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.61 (0.5, 0.73) | 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) | 0.39 (0.3, 0.51) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.8) | 0.34 (0.24, 0.47) | 0.41 (0.32, 0.52) | 0.18 (0.11, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 16.84 (9.51, 33.75) | 22.3 (17.17, 45.23) | 15.56 (11.41, 26.94) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) | 0.75 (0.65, 0.86) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) | 0.71 (0.62, 0.82) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.59 (0.48, 0.71) | 0.69 (0.6, 0.79) | 0.56 (0.46, 0.68) |
1L, first-line therapy; 2L, second-line therapy; ALKi, ALK inhibitor; rwPFS, real-world progression-free survival; TTTD, time to treatment discontinuation; OS, overall survival; NR, not reached (median survival estimate could not be calculated).
Conclusions
The use of ALKi in the US reflects current clinical guidelines. Despite the choice and established benefit of individual ALKi as first-line therapy, more than 25% of pts received a non-ALKi as first-line therapy, even in recent years (2017/2018). Furthermore, in clinical practice, treatment beyond progression with an ALKi is relatively common. OS for non-ALKi was comparable to some ALKi, but OS is also reflective of treatment received in later lines of therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Nicola Griffin of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M.G. Krebs: Advisory / Consultancy: Achilles Therapeutics, Janssen, Octmet and Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): BerGenBio and Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca and BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Blueprint, Carrick, Immutep, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Octimet and Roche. L. Polito: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. V. Smoljanović: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Trinh: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc. G. Crane: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc.
Resources from the same session
4294 - The Patient Voice: An Irish Survey of Nutrition Attitudes & Access to Dietetic Care Throughout the Cancer Journey
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1925 - Homcology: home chemotherapy delivery in a simultaneous care project for frail advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Claudio Chini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4701 - Treatment-related adverse events and tolerability in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy
Presenter: Ruth D'cunha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2985 - Clinical utility of a systematic toxicity assessment form (STAF) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2358 - Physicians’ satisfaction with Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in daily clinical practice using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) for cancer patients.
Presenter: Guillaume Mouillet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5172 - Predictors of Survival in Patients with Incurable Cancer
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2281 - Patients and Physicians' Satisfaction with Telemedicine (TM) in Cancer Care and Factors that Correlate with a Positive Patient’s Experience
Presenter: Hurria Gondal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2193 - Adherence to ESMO 2014 guidelines on bone-targeting agent (BTA) initiation for breast and prostate cancer patients: real-world insights from practicing European physicians
Presenter: Alex Rider
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2200 - Use of skeletal-related events preventive agents in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in central Denmark
Presenter: Anders Boysen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2504 - Inadequacy of current definition and staging system of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ) released by AAOMS : a Computed Tomography study in 151 cancer and myeloma patients
Presenter: Vittorio Fusco
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract