Abstract 5239
Background
ALK inhibitors (ALKi) have shown substantial benefit in pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. We describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC in the US.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilised US electronic health record data from Flatiron Health. Pts diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV ALK+ NSCLC from 1 Jan 2011 to 30 Sep 2018 were included. Treatment patterns and outcomes (real-world progression-free survival [rwPFS] and overall survival [OS]) were extracted for first- or second-line therapy. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD) was used as a surrogate for real-world treatment duration accounting for treatment beyond progression. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Data were available for 620 pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC. An ALKi was given to 420/620 (67.7%) pts as first-line therapy and 273/359 (76.0%) pts who received second-line therapy. Among non-ALKi treatments, platinum-based regimens were the most common. Crizotinib was the preferred first-line ALKi up to 2016, and then alectinib. As second-line therapy, crizotinib was the preferred ALKi up to 2013, followed by ceritinib from 2014–2015, and then alectinib to the end of the follow-up period. TTTD, rwPFS and OS were longest with alectinib, followed by crizotinib and non-ALKi (Table).Table:
1546P
1L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 98) | Ceritinib (n = 4) | Crizotinib (n = 318) | non-ALKi (n = 200) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 5.06 (0.72, NR) | 6.41 (5.92, 8.16) | 8.26 (6.25, 9.9) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.55 (0.49, 0.6) | 0.59 (0.52, 0.66) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.32 (0.27, 0.38) | 0.37 (0.3, 0.44) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 7.57 (6.97, 9.14) | 3.12 (2.76, 4.38) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.92) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.61 (0.56, 0.67) | 0.35 (0.29, 0.43) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.73 (0.64, 0.84) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.36 (0.31, 0.42) | 0.21 (0.16, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 23.06 (16.51, 30.86) | 27.99 (21.6, 36.51) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.78 (0.73, 0.82) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.65 (0.6, 0.7) | 0.71 (0.65, 0.78) | ||
2L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 90) | Ceritinib (n = 75) | Crizotinib (n = 97) | non-ALKi (n = 86) |
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | 13.59 (10.33, NR) | 6.32 (4.64, 8.45) | 6.88 (4.9, 9.87) | 4.4 (2.96, 6.81) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.76 (0.68, 0.86) | 0.51 (0.4, 0.64) | 0.54 (0.45, 0.65) | 0.4 (0.31, 0.52) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.55 (0.44, 0.68) | 0.25 (0.16, 0.37) | 0.35 (0.26, 0.46) | 0.22 (0.14, 0.33) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | 19.84 (14.54, NR) | 8.19 (6.22, 11.84) | 8.72 (7.37, 5.36) | 4.61 (3.42, 6.18) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.61 (0.5, 0.73) | 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) | 0.39 (0.3, 0.51) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.8) | 0.34 (0.24, 0.47) | 0.41 (0.32, 0.52) | 0.18 (0.11, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 16.84 (9.51, 33.75) | 22.3 (17.17, 45.23) | 15.56 (11.41, 26.94) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) | 0.75 (0.65, 0.86) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) | 0.71 (0.62, 0.82) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.59 (0.48, 0.71) | 0.69 (0.6, 0.79) | 0.56 (0.46, 0.68) |
1L, first-line therapy; 2L, second-line therapy; ALKi, ALK inhibitor; rwPFS, real-world progression-free survival; TTTD, time to treatment discontinuation; OS, overall survival; NR, not reached (median survival estimate could not be calculated).
Conclusions
The use of ALKi in the US reflects current clinical guidelines. Despite the choice and established benefit of individual ALKi as first-line therapy, more than 25% of pts received a non-ALKi as first-line therapy, even in recent years (2017/2018). Furthermore, in clinical practice, treatment beyond progression with an ALKi is relatively common. OS for non-ALKi was comparable to some ALKi, but OS is also reflective of treatment received in later lines of therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Nicola Griffin of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M.G. Krebs: Advisory / Consultancy: Achilles Therapeutics, Janssen, Octmet and Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): BerGenBio and Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca and BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Blueprint, Carrick, Immutep, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Octimet and Roche. L. Polito: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. V. Smoljanović: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Trinh: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc. G. Crane: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc.
Resources from the same session
5103 - CANOPY phase 3 program: Three studies evaluating canakinumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Luis Paz-Ares
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3666 - The Elderly Patient Individualized Chemotherapy (EPIC) trial, a study for an aged population of non-small cell lung cancer.
Presenter: Francesco Passiglia
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4799 - KEYNOTE-495/KeyImPaCT: A Randomized, Biomarker-Directed, Phase 2 Trial of Pembrolizumab-Based Therapy for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Martin Gutierrez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6035 - Safety, tolerability and activity of autologous T cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY ESO 1/LAGE 1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non small cell lung cancer: A Phase 1b/2a randomised pilot study
Presenter: Karen Reckamp
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2176 - IFCT-1701 DICIPLE: a randomized phase 3 trial comparing continuation Nivolumab-Ipilimumab doublet immunotherapy until progression versus observation in patients with PDL1-positive stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) after Nivolumab-Ipilimumab induction treatment
Presenter: Gerard Zalcman
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2352 - ATALANTE-1 randomized phase 3 trial, OSE-2101 versus standard treatment as second or third line in HLA-A2 positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2451 - Phase Ib dose-escalation/expansion study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4285 - Radiosurgery followed by Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) for brain metastases (1-10) from NSCLC in the phase 3 METIS trial
Presenter: Minesh Mehta
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4909 - Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) versus chemotherapy plus nivolumab (CN) in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC): the SQUINT trial
Presenter: Lorenza Landi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4125 - DUBLIN-3, a Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC Phase (Ph)3 Trial Comparing the Plinabulin (P)/Docetaxel(D) Combination with D Alone
Presenter: Ramon Mohanlal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract