Abstract 5239
Background
ALK inhibitors (ALKi) have shown substantial benefit in pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. We describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC in the US.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilised US electronic health record data from Flatiron Health. Pts diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV ALK+ NSCLC from 1 Jan 2011 to 30 Sep 2018 were included. Treatment patterns and outcomes (real-world progression-free survival [rwPFS] and overall survival [OS]) were extracted for first- or second-line therapy. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD) was used as a surrogate for real-world treatment duration accounting for treatment beyond progression. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Data were available for 620 pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC. An ALKi was given to 420/620 (67.7%) pts as first-line therapy and 273/359 (76.0%) pts who received second-line therapy. Among non-ALKi treatments, platinum-based regimens were the most common. Crizotinib was the preferred first-line ALKi up to 2016, and then alectinib. As second-line therapy, crizotinib was the preferred ALKi up to 2013, followed by ceritinib from 2014–2015, and then alectinib to the end of the follow-up period. TTTD, rwPFS and OS were longest with alectinib, followed by crizotinib and non-ALKi (Table).Table:
1546P
1L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 98) | Ceritinib (n = 4) | Crizotinib (n = 318) | non-ALKi (n = 200) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 5.06 (0.72, NR) | 6.41 (5.92, 8.16) | 8.26 (6.25, 9.9) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.55 (0.49, 0.6) | 0.59 (0.52, 0.66) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.32 (0.27, 0.38) | 0.37 (0.3, 0.44) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 7.57 (6.97, 9.14) | 3.12 (2.76, 4.38) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.92) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.61 (0.56, 0.67) | 0.35 (0.29, 0.43) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.73 (0.64, 0.84) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.36 (0.31, 0.42) | 0.21 (0.16, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 6.1 (0.72, NR) | 23.06 (16.51, 30.86) | 27.99 (21.6, 36.51) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.5 (0.19, 1) | 0.78 (0.73, 0.82) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.25 (0.05, 1) | 0.65 (0.6, 0.7) | 0.71 (0.65, 0.78) | ||
2L | Outcome | Statistics | Alectinib (n = 90) | Ceritinib (n = 75) | Crizotinib (n = 97) | non-ALKi (n = 86) |
rwPFS | Median (95% CI), months | 13.59 (10.33, NR) | 6.32 (4.64, 8.45) | 6.88 (4.9, 9.87) | 4.4 (2.96, 6.81) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.76 (0.68, 0.86) | 0.51 (0.4, 0.64) | 0.54 (0.45, 0.65) | 0.4 (0.31, 0.52) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.55 (0.44, 0.68) | 0.25 (0.16, 0.37) | 0.35 (0.26, 0.46) | 0.22 (0.14, 0.33) | ||
TTTD | Median (95% CI), months | 19.84 (14.54, NR) | 8.19 (6.22, 11.84) | 8.72 (7.37, 5.36) | 4.61 (3.42, 6.18) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.61 (0.5, 0.73) | 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) | 0.39 (0.3, 0.51) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.68 (0.58, 0.8) | 0.34 (0.24, 0.47) | 0.41 (0.32, 0.52) | 0.18 (0.11, 0.28) | ||
OS | Median (95% CI), months | NR | 16.84 (9.51, 33.75) | 22.3 (17.17, 45.23) | 15.56 (11.41, 26.94) | |
6-month probability (95% CI) | 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) | 0.75 (0.65, 0.86) | 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) | 0.71 (0.62, 0.82) | ||
12-month probability (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 0.59 (0.48, 0.71) | 0.69 (0.6, 0.79) | 0.56 (0.46, 0.68) |
1L, first-line therapy; 2L, second-line therapy; ALKi, ALK inhibitor; rwPFS, real-world progression-free survival; TTTD, time to treatment discontinuation; OS, overall survival; NR, not reached (median survival estimate could not be calculated).
Conclusions
The use of ALKi in the US reflects current clinical guidelines. Despite the choice and established benefit of individual ALKi as first-line therapy, more than 25% of pts received a non-ALKi as first-line therapy, even in recent years (2017/2018). Furthermore, in clinical practice, treatment beyond progression with an ALKi is relatively common. OS for non-ALKi was comparable to some ALKi, but OS is also reflective of treatment received in later lines of therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Nicola Griffin of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M.G. Krebs: Advisory / Consultancy: Achilles Therapeutics, Janssen, Octmet and Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): BerGenBio and Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca and BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Blueprint, Carrick, Immutep, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Octimet and Roche. L. Polito: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. V. Smoljanović: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Trinh: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc. G. Crane: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc.
Resources from the same session
4369 - Biomarker testing of lung cancer in Spain
Presenter: Delvys Rodriguez Abreu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
603 - Mendelian Randomization Study of Alzheimer's Disease and Lung Cancer
Presenter: Huaqiang Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4462 - Spanish registry of thoracic tumors (TTR): Interim analyses of comorbidities, risk associations, personal and family history of cancer
Presenter: Rafael Lopez Castro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3957 - Pleural effusion TGF-beta is highly diagnostic and prognostic in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Paul Stockhammer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3583 - Immune microenvironment modulation by p14/ARF in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Presenter: Giulia Pasello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4255 - Tumor Treating Fields plus chemotherapy for first-line malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): radiological responses in the STELLAR trial
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1803 - Effects of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 150 kHz) and Cisplatin or Pemetrexed Combination Therapy on Mesothelioma cells In Vitro and In Vivo
Presenter: Mijal Munster
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2660 - Real world use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)
Presenter: Susana Cedres
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3150 - Pemetrexed/Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as first-line treatment for Egyptian patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Mohamed Alorabi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4319 - Accuracy of pathologic evaluation for thymic epithelial tumors in an Italian reference Centre
Presenter: Giulia Galli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract