Abstract 888
Background
Multiple national1 and international2 guidelines recommend that genetic testing is provided by genetic experts in the context of genetic counselling. However, there has been little research performed assessing the utility of genetic counselling. This study was performed to determine the value of genetic counselling for individuals undergoing breast cancer genetic testing.
Methods
GeneHealth UK clinical records for patients seen between the 1st January 2018 and 30th June 2018 for breast cancer were reviewed to determine what was discussed during the consultations. Data was collated in four categories: a) appropriateness of genetic testing, b) psychological support, c) implications for relatives d) management guidance.
Results
Of a total of 130 patients, 74% (96) had breast cancer, and 26% (34) had a family history. 10% of tested patients had a pathogenic genetic variant. 98% of patients had at least one discussion in the assessed areas; 16% had two, 21% had three and 52% had four or more. Genetic counselling helped 15% of patients decide not to proceed with genetic testing: either because a relative would be more appropriate to test (5%), the patient had a low risk of a BRCA mutation (3%) or for psychological reasons (7%). Psychological support was provided to 15% of patients including the provision of support resources in 12% and referral for counselling in 2% of cases. Genetic counsellors assess the whole family and were therefore able to provide screening recommendations for relatives in 62% of cases and assess risk of other familial conditions in 2% of families. Of importance external referrals were made in 6% of patients.
Conclusions
Genetic counselling provides significant psychosocial and practical benefits in the provision of breast cancer genetics: including advice for the whole family, ensuring genetic testing is appropriate and referral to appropriate external healthcare agencies. 1 NICE Guidance 2 NCCN Guidelines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Kiesel: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Genehealth UK. G. Wishart: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Check4Cancer.
Resources from the same session
3139 - Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/Aflibercept (FA) in elderly population with mCRC after failure of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
Presenter: Nieves Martinez Lago
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3446 - Fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients: preliminary data from the prospective observational CHECKPOINT trial (NCT02665312)
Presenter: Pasquale Lombardi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3969 - Comparable survival outcome between Thai patients with sporadic young adult and adult onset colorectal cancer
Presenter: Kanjana Sukhokanjanachusak
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4455 - Impact of primary tumor side on 3-year survival outcomes of first-line (1L) FOLFOX-4 ± cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase 3 TAILOR trial
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4481 - Undetectable RAS mutant clones in plasma: possible implication for therapy and prognosis in the patient with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer?
Presenter: Mohamed Bouchahda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5074 - Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) determination prior the administration of medicines containing fluorouracil: a single Spanish hospital experience.
Presenter: Maria Dolores Mediano Rambla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5242 - Differences in survival between right and left-sided colorrectal cancer (CRC) in every stage, a CARESS-CCR Group Study.
Presenter: Julia Alcaide-Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1123 - Quality of Life (QoL) in patients with aflibercept (AFL) and FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) – Interim analysis with focus on mutational status of the non-interventional study QoLiTrap (AIO-LQ-0113)
Presenter: Roger von Moos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1212 - The cost of adverse event management in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line cetuximab and panitumumab: an Italian healthcare payer perspective
Presenter: Karl Patterson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1619 - Meta-analysis of KRAS Mutation as prognostic factor in patients (pts.) with resection of colorectal (CRC) liver metastases: Tumor burden and Sideness analysis.
Presenter: Maria Romina Luca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract