Abstract 5416
Background
Emerging data suggest that sex-related immune system composition affect both immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients (pts). This study aimed to investigate the sex-related prognostic role of MLR in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pts.
Methods
We analyzed a retrospective consecutive cohort of 490 mCRC pts treated in 2004-2017 at the Oncology Departments of Aviano and Pordenone (training set) and Udine (validation set), Italy. Association analysis was explored by Chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate. The prognostic impact of MLR on overall survival (OS) was evaluated with uni- and multivariable Cox regression models. The best cut-off value to predict survival was defined through ROC analyses.
Results
Overall, we identified 288 males and 202 females; 161 pts (33%) had a right cancer and 324 (67%) a left one. Interestingly, sex was associated with MLR (p = 0.004). The obtained cut-off value for MLR in females and males was 0.27 and 0.49, respectively. At univariate analysis of training set, MLR >0.27 in females (HR 1.95, p = 0.003) and MLR >0.49 in males (HR 2.65, p = 0.010) were associated with poorer OS. Even in the validation set, MLR >0.27 in females (HR 2.21, p = 0.010) and MLR >0.49 in males (HR 2.99, p = 0.002) were associated with shorter OS. In the overall cohort, at univariate analysis MLR >0.27 in females (HR 2.07, p ≤ 0.001), MLR >0.49 in males (HR 2.87, p ≤ 0.001), KRAS mutation (HR 1.37 p = 0.008), BRAF mutation (HR 1.69 p = 0.009), sidedness (right vs left HR 1.59, p ≤ 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (HR 2.32, p ≤ 0.001) were associated with shorter OS. Instead, primary tumor resection (HR 0.37 p ≤ 0.001) was associated with prolonged OS. At multivariate analysis, MLR >0.27 in females (HR 2.77, p = 0.002), MLR >0.49 in males (HR 5.39, p ≤ 0.001), BRAF mutation (HR 3.38, p ≤ 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (HR 2.50, p = 0.003) were still independently associated with worse OS. Noteworthy, high MLR was more frequently found in females than in males (41% vs 9%).
Conclusions
Males and females have a different immune response. Our study showed that high MLR, both in males and females, is an unfavorable independent prognostic factor. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
IRCCS CRO National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F. Puglisi: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Hoffmann-La Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pierre-Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4732 - Progesterone Receptor Isoform Ratio Dictates Antiprogestins/Progestins Effects on Metastatic Breast Cancer Models
Presenter: Maria Abascal
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5737 - PAM50 and CGH-array genomic characterization of HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations.
Presenter: Carine Ngo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1096 - OncotypeDX® predictive nomogram for recurrence score output: a machine learning system based on quantitative immunochemistry analysis - ADAPTED01
Presenter: Fabio Marazzi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5426 - Geriatric parameters predict both disease-related and patient-reported outcomes in older patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Willeke van der Plas-Krijgsman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5865 - Patients with a 21-gene assay in South East London differ from the TAILORx trial population
Presenter: Charalampos Gousis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1312 - Predictive tools in adjuvant breast cancer – what is the standard of evidence supporting their utility? A literature review examining validation of Adjuvant!, Cancermath and NHS Predict
Presenter: Alice Loft
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2445 - Oncologic outcome of invasive lobular carcinoma: Is it different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma?
Presenter: Hee Jun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2476 - Pathologic response and survival efficacy in patients with initial nodal involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
Presenter: SERAFIN MORALES Murillo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3761 - Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: prognostic impact on premenopausal Egyptian patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Khaled Abdel Karim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4687 - Predicting the presence of breast cancer using circulating small RNA in the serum
Presenter: Yumiko Koi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract