Abstract 2667
Background
For the past 20 years, the improvement in OS has been achieved in mCRC. Active agents including anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibodies have contributed to this progress. Late-line treatment with regorafenib (REGO) or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has also been demonstrated to be effective and these drugs are widely used as standard CT. However, no study has reported to what extent the availability of these two drugs changes the total OS of patients that is measured from the initiation of first-line CT.
Methods
We retrospectively enrolled consecutive mCRC pts at 3 institutions who received first-line CT between Jan 2005 and Sep 2016. We divided the pts into 3 groups according to the availability of drugs at the initiation of first-line CT; pts who started CT between Jan 2005 and Dec 2006 (cohort A: only cytotoxic drugs were available), between Jan 2007 and Dec 2011 (cohort B: anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR antibody were available), or between Jan 2012 and Sep 2016 (cohort C: REGO and FTD/TPI were available). Treatment outcomes were compared among the cohort A, B, and C.
Results
A total of 1,426 pts were analyzed. Pts characteristics of the cohort A (165 pts), B (626 pts), and C (635 pts) were as follows: median age, 62/64/65 years; ECOG PS ≥ 2, 8.5%/8.8%/8.2%; right-sided primary, 26.1%/29.4%/29.9%; tumor grade Grade 3, 10.1%/13.1%/11.9%; KRAS mutation, 28.6%/38.4%/41.1%; and number of metastatic sites ≥2, 63.6%/61.3%/58.1%. In the cohort A, B, and C, 1.2%, 10.7%, and 31.2% of the pts received at least one of late-line treatment with REGO or FTD/TPI. Median OS of the cohort A, B, and C was 18.6 month (M), 25.3 M, and 27.2 M. Hazard ratio (HR) of death was 0.82 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.68-0.98; p = 0.0309) for the cohort B vs A, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.86; p = 0.0004) for the cohort C vs A, and 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.99; p = 0.0356) for the cohort C vs B.
Conclusions
This real-world data analysis indicates that late-line treatment with REGO or FTD/TPI could contribute to the prolongation of OS from the initiation of first-line CT for mCRC pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T. Masuishi: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck Serono, Chugai Pharma, Yakult Honsha, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Bayer Yakuhin, Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Yakult Honsha. Y. Kawamoto: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, Eli Lilly. S. Yuki: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Pharma International Inc., Yakult H. Y. Komatsu: Honoraria (self): Taiho, Chugai, Yakult, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Merck, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho, Chugai, Yakult, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Merck, Takeda. K. Muro: Honoraria (self): Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Yakult Honsha, Merck Serono, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Shionogi, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Gilead Sciences, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi. T. Yamanaka: Honoraria (self): Chugai, Takeda, Taiho, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead Sciences, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sysmex, Huya Biosciences; Honoraria (institution): Chugai, Takeda, Taiho, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, Merck Serono, Astellas, Eli Lilly. K. Yamazaki: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Yakult Honsha, Takeda, Bayer, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Taiho Pharmceutical, Lilly, Sanofi, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4842 - The analysis of genomic signatures of head and body/tail of pancreatic cancer in Chinese patients
Presenter: Qi Ling
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4988 - MGMT methylation in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC): a single center experience
Presenter: Monica Niger
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5035 - Advantage of three-dimensional image analysis of pancreatic cancer using computed tomography
Presenter: Seung Bae Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1465 - Phase I study of the oncolytic viral immunotherapy agent Canerpaturev (C-REV) with S-1 in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Susumu Hijioka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1982 - Impact of anatomic site of biliary tract tumour origin and conditional probability of survival (CS): results from 15 prospective advanced first-line clinical trial
Presenter: Mairead McNamara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2244 - FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFIRINOX in first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis
Presenter: Angélique Vienot
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4557 - Cellfree tumor-DNA (cfDNA) as a very early predictor of therapeutic outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Sabine Payr
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4406 - Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of gall bladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in patients from distinct ancestral populations
Presenter: Milind Javle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4283 - Phase II Monotherapy Efficacy of Cancer Metabolism Targeting SM-88 in Heavily Pre-Treated PDAC Patients.
Presenter: Allyson Ocean
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2078 - Comprehensive genomic profiling and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with fibroblast growth factor receptor rearrangement-positive (FGFR2+) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) treated with pemigatinib in the fight-202 trial
Presenter: Antoine Hollebecque
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract