Abstract 1152
Background
This study was carried out as randomized-controlled, longitudinal interventional to determine whether there was a difference between the mean scores of compassion fatigue (CF), burnout (BO), compassion satisfaction (CS), perceived stress (PS) and psychological resilience (PR) after applying the short-term and long-term ‘Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program’ for nurses working in the field of oncology-hematology.
Methods
The sample of the study consisted of oncology-hematology nurses working in two private hospitals, one university hospital. Hospitals were randomly assigned to experiment I (n:34), experiment II (n: 49) and control groups (n: 42). Short-term (two days, five hours per day) program implemented to experiment I, long-term (five weeks, 2 hours a week) program implemented to experiment II and no any intervention implemented to control group. Measurements were made pre-intervention, post-intervention, third month, sixth month and first year. The data were collected by personal information form, professional quality of life scale-IV, PS scale, and PR scale for adults. SPSS 24 package program was used to analyze the data of the study. Primary research hypotheses were tested with multilevel models (MLM).
Results
There was no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of CF, BO, PS and PR of the nurses in the short-term, long-term and control groups. The mean compassion satisfaction score of the nurses in the short-term and long-term education group was statistically significantly higher than in the control group. The mean CS scores of the nurses in both the short and long-term education groups were statistically significantly higher in the sixth month and first year follow-up measurements than in the pre-intervention period.
Conclusions
In this study, considering the effects of long-term and short-term education on CF, BO, CS, perceived stress and PR of nurses, it can be said that these two educations have the same effect on CS. It is the first study with randomized-controlled method, including the follow-up of up to a year. Doing new studies that are revealing the effect of this education can be suggested.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tuğba Pehlivan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract