Abstract 3752
Background
The expanding armamentarium of wearable devices offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with continuously acquired real-life patient data. It is relevant to identify and characterize the level of association between wearable device physical activity (PA) metrics and PS in cancer patients as a first step into evaluating their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between wearable device PA metrics and PS in cancer patients.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies that were conducted among adults with cancer, quantitatively assessed a relation between wearable device PA metrics and PS, and had a full text available in English. We extracted information on study design and population, wearable device type and PA metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to methodological quality assessment.
Results
Nine studies with a total of 574 patients were included in this review. Eight studies had a prospective observational study design and all studies reported on a different combination of wearable device PA metrics including: steps per day (n = 5), sedentary behavior (n = 5), and PA volume/intensity (n = 4). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, wearable devices used, and reporting of results. None of the studies could be defined to be of ‘high methodological quality’ (≥ 70%): mean methodological quality was 47% and ranged from 40-60%. We found moderate evidence for a positive association between steps per day and PS, and for a negative association between sedentary behavior and PS.
Conclusions
Much heterogeneity was identified between studies with regards to study population, reported PA metrics, and used devices. Nevertheless, results of this study indicate that higher daily step count is associated with better PS in cancer patients. Whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse PS. The next step into determining their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions is to investigate the association between wearable device PA metrics and cancer outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H.W. Wilmink: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. M. van Oijen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1945 - Randomized Phase II Study of Trabectedin/Olaparib Compared to Physician’s Choice in Subjects with Previously Treated Advanced or Recurrent Solid Tumors Harboring DNA Repair Deficiencies.
Presenter: Christoph Heilig
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3021 - Homogenisation of Leftover Surgical Tissue across multiple cancer types: a Feasibility Study (HoLST-F)
Presenter: Lavinia Spain
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2882 - Safety, efficacy, and immune effects of intratumoral tilsotolimod in patients with refractory solid tumors: updated results from ILLUMINATE-101
Presenter: Hani Babiker
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1950 - Phase 1 Dose Escalation of MSC-1, a humanized anti-LIF monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results
Presenter: Erkut Borazanci
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2391 - A phase 1 study of Sym021, an anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab), alone and in combination with Sym022 (anti-LAG-3) or Sym023 (anti-TIM-3)
Presenter: Anna Spreafico
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5692 - FPA150 (B7-H4 antibody) Phase 1 Update in Advanced Solid Tumors: Monotherapy and in Combination with Pembrolizumab
Presenter: Zev Wainberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2416 - MG1124, a novel CEACAM1-targeted monoclonal antibody, has therapeutic potential as a combination partner of PD-1 inhibitors in NSCLC patients
Presenter: Eun Hee Lee
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2661 - Tumor stroma targeting and modulation by OMTX705 ADC, a novel and potent immunotherapeutic treatment of solid tumors.
Presenter: Myriam Fabre
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3681 - Durvalumab + monalizumab, mFOLFOX6, and bevacizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC)
Presenter: May Cho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2664 - Phase (Ph) II study of MBG453 + spartalizumab in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma pretreated with anti–PD-1/L1 therapy
Presenter: Nicholas Mach
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract