Abstract 2226
Background
We report secondary and exploratory analysis with 18F-NaF PET/CT and CTCs to determine how tumour burden and RNA expression of androgen receptor (AR) splice variants and neuroendocrine (NE) features predict duration of treatment (DoTx) with ENZA.
Methods
Men with progressive mCRPC with ≥ 2 lesions on bone scintigraphy were enrolled and treated with ENZA 160 mg daily at 3 US sites. 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were obtained at baseline (BL) (PET1), week 13 (PET2), and at the time of PSA progression (per PCWG2 criteria), standard radiographic or clinical progression, or at 2 years without progression (PET3) using QTBI. CTCs were obtained at BL and at PET3. PSA decline and DoTx were compared with BL QTBI, CTC metrics, and change in QTBI.
Results
23 men (median age, 72 years [range, 51-93]; median PSA, 20.5 ng/mL [range, 3.9-133.6]) were enrolled; 22 of which completed planned imaging. The mean number of bone lesions on PET1 was 58 (range 9-168), with a median total standardized uptake value (SUVtotal) of 3886.5 (range 506.7-22852.8). DoTx ranged from 1.4 to 31.8+ mo. In general, SUV metrics decreased while on ENZA (PET2) and increased by PET3. Change in lesion heterogeneity (PET1 to PET3) was the most significant predictor of time to PSA progression (hazard ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-12.1). ARV7/9 was found in CTCs in 3/20 men and NE features were found in 4/20 men at BL and in 4/19 and in 11/19 men, respectively, at PET3.
Conclusions
Although PSA response with ENZA is high, DoTx is variable. SUVtotal at BL did not correlate with DoTx; however, decrease in SUVtotal/mean was associated with increased DoTx, with less heterogeneity correlating with a longer time to PSA progression. ARV7/9 or NE expression in CTCs did not predict lack of benefit from ENZA; however, at the time of progression, the observed increase in ARV7/9 and NE expression are consistent with tumor evolution to more aggressive phenotypes. While BL heterogeneity may be prognostic, it may not predict response or DoTx. Assessing response heterogeneity may predict response duration, thus, should be explored as a possible surrogate of benefit in future studies.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02384382.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing and editorial assistance funded by Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma, Inc. was provided by Stephanie Vadasz, PhD, and Michele Salernitano from Ashfield Healthcare Communications.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Funding
Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Disclosure
G. Liu: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee: AIQ Solutions; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): TRACON Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Madison Vaccines Inc.; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer Inc. C.E. Kyriakopoulos: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Exelixis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: The France Foundation; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi. J.M. Lang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, I am listed on the patent on a technology for rare cell capture and analysis. This technology has been licensed by Salus Discovery, LLC though no commercial products are available: Salus Discovery; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Agensys; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. E.I. Heath: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Agensys; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Dendreon; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tokai Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Millennium; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celldex; Research grant / Funding (institution): Inovio Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Zenith Epigenetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Esanik; Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncolys BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): CureMeta; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): eFFECTOR Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Fortis. S. Perlman: Research grant / Funding (institution): GE Healthcare Progenics; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer Inc. T. Mayer: Advisory / Consultancy: Beacon Biosciences/ICON Medical; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sotio; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer Inc. K. Modelska: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee: Pfizer Inc. A. Porcari: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee: Pfizer Inc. W. Duggan: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee: Pfizer Inc. R. Jeraj: Licensing / Royalties, Patents: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AIQ Solutions; Research grant / Funding (institution): GE Healthcare. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract