Abstract 1124
Background
We previously showed that therapy with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 agents was more effective for men as compared with women. Here we investigated whether women derive larger benefit than men from different immunotherapeutic strategies.
Methods
We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis, including all RCTs testing anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 given either alone or combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors, to assess different efficacy of these two immunotherapeutic strategies according to patients’ sex. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the difference of treatments efficacy between males and females, measured in terms of difference of the overall survival log(HR) reported in males and in females for each treatment strategy For this purpose, the pooled OS HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated in males and females using random-effects model and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was evaluated using an interaction test.
Results
16 phase III RCTs testing anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 in monotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in 9291 patients with advanced solid tumors were included in the analysis. Two RCTs were performed in patients with melanoma, 8 in NSCLC, 2 in HNSCC, 2 in gastric cancer, and 1 each in kidney and urothelial cancer. In 15 out of 16 of such RCTs, men derived larger OS benefit than women. The pooled-OS HR was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78) in men versus 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.94) in women (heterogeneity-p=0.0079). 5 phase III RCTs testing the combination of chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 versus chemotherapy in 2979 patients were included in the analysis. Four RCTs were performed in NSCLC and 1 in SCLC. All these 5 RCTs showed impressively larger OS benefit in women. The pooled-OS HR was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41-0.60) in women versus 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.87) in men (heterogeneity p = 0.0003).
Conclusions
We confirmed a large and significant interaction between patients’ sex and the efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 drugs given in monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. The direction of such interaction was the opposite for the two immunotherapeutic strategies: women derived impressively larger benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to anti-PD1/PD-L1 as compared with men.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabio Conforti.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract