Abstract 3350
Background
Clinical pathways in oncology have become increasingly complex, involving several different healthcare professionals inside and outside the hospital setting who need particular coordination to provide appropriate care for patients. Very few QI exist to evaluate the oncological clinical pathway in its entirety, particularly regarding the various stages between patient admissions and discharges and the liaisons with non-hospital healthcare professionals (e.g. GPs, pharmacists). Our objective is to select a number of QI describing the oncological clinical pathway with an expert panel.
Methods
A systematic review of available QI describing the oncological clinical pathways in the literature was conducted. The list of selected QI was presented to an expert panel (oncologists, pharmacists and SRNs) of various hospitals in France. The selection involved a two-step process: a preliminary selection was conducted based on the title and rationale of the QI by consensus (nominal group), assigning a value to each QI reviewed on the basis of its appropriateness and its feasibility (1st working group). The pre-selected QI were then described in detail and presented to the expert panel (2nd working group) in order to validate the selection.
Results
5731 QI were identified in the literature review and 131 included. 17 indicators were pre-selected by the experts (1st working group). After presentation of the 17 detailed descriptors, the QIs were clustered or eliminated. Ultimately, 10 QI were selected (Table): outcome (2), process (3) and structure (5).Table: 1658P
QI | Description | Type |
---|---|---|
1 | Symptoms and disease progression | Structure |
2 | Assessment of tolerance to treatment | Process |
3 | Management of patients receiving oral therapy | Structure |
4 | Quality of the liaison document | Process |
5 | Composite score for supportive care | Structure |
6 | Patient therapeutic education | Structure |
7 | Medication reconciliation | Process |
8 | Unscheduled admissions | Outcome |
9 | Declaration and follow-up upon serious adverse events in clinical pathway | Structure |
10 | Patient’s experience (PREMS) | Outcome |
Conclusions
This approach will be developed further by presenting the IQs to patient associations and primary care physicians in order to gather their feedback, refine, adapt and ultimately create a representative set of indicators.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Novartis Oncology France.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4596 - A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Encorafenib + Binimetinib Evaluating a Standard-dose and a High-dose Regimen in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastasis (MBM) (POLARIS)
Presenter: Michael Davies
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1891 - Continuation of annual screening mammograms and breast-cancer mortality in women over 70
Presenter: Xabier Garcia De Albeniz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5587 - Introducing standardized medical procedure and dynamic decision support program in precision oncology for the community of practice
Presenter: Istvan Petak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4757 - Effectively using primary care givers in oncology care through capacity building, task sharing and techno-mentoring.
Presenter: Dinesh Pendharkar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4497 - A single institution review of capecitabine related acute admissions and cost analysis
Presenter: Gemma Dart
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2187 - Health status of middle-aged and older cancer survivors in China: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
Presenter: Jiarui Li
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5101 - Crossed looks on lung cancer perception and knowledge from general public and physicians in France: results of a two-fold survey
Presenter: Céline Mascaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4354 - Knowledge and perception of clinical trials (CTs) and attitude towards participation among Polish oncological patients - A pilot survey
Presenter: Artur Kotowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3499 - Achieving best possible cancer treatment outcomes in care pathways through benchmarking; ABC-Benchmarking
Presenter: Anke Wind
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract