Abstract 2202
Background
Chemotherapy-induced temporary hair loss is one of the most common and distressing side-effects of cancer therapy. Scalp cooling is a long known method to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia in cancer patients, especially when antracycline or taxanes are used. However scalp cooling to reduce hair loss is still a controversial issue.
Methods
We included 210 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy both in (neo) adjuvant and palliative setting. Evaluation was focused on the quantification of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), satisfaction and side effects of the scalp cooling system. the severity of hair loss was assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0 by the nurses team together with the patient. Nurses completed questionnaires on patients baseline characteristics and type of chemotherapy received during each session of scalp-cooling The following chemotherapeutic treatments were included: doxorubicin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel,paclitaxel alone; FEC ; FEC followed by docetaxel.
Results
The mean overall success rate of scalp cooling (<50% hair loss) was at 62%. In the final results, major hair loss was avoided in 85% patients given taxane treatment, in 79% of patients given FEC treatment and in 32% of patients given AC treatment. None of these patients needed to use a wig and all of them were satisfied about the results at the final evaluation. 87% of the patients considered the avoidance of hair loss to be important before starting the chemotherapy. 12 patients discontinued scalp cooling for side-effects or low compliance.
Conclusions
Nurse team were properly trained and provided with higher experience; a standardized approach was used by the nurse staff for each patient with dedicated time. Our experience showed that scalp cooler provides a good chance for breast cancer patients to keep their hair during anthracyclines and/or taxane containing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and could be integrated into daily practice of chemotherapy unit.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fabrizio Artioli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract