Abstract 5031
Background
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revealed a new panel of tumor response and adverse events. Immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions is frequently misdiagnosed as progressive or recurrent disease. This study aims to decipher the diagnosis hallmark of immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions as well as its association with patients’ outcome.
Methods
From August 2014 and December 2018, in a centralized single center review, we retrospectively included all patients with histologically proven immune-related sarcoidosis-like reaction during a treatment with ICI in monotherapy or combination. 54 variables were retrospectively recorded: clinical (n = 17), biological (n = 11) and radiological (n = 26), as well as the objective response to treatment using the best overall response according to iRECIST.
Results
Out of 3,200 patients treated with ICI, a total of 18 histologically proven sarcoidosis were diagnosed. The majority were female patients (n = 11/18) treated for melanoma (n = 14/18) or clear renal cell carcinoma (n = 3/18). The median [range] time to diagnosis of a sarcoidosis-like reaction was 30 [5-126] weeks after ICI treatment initiation. On CT-scans, the most common radiological findings were: absence of radiographical progression of the primary tumor per RECIST1.1 (100%), bilateral symmetrical mediastinal lymphadenopathy (100%), symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy (84%), and micronodules with lymphatic distribution (15%). On PET-CT, an extrathoracic glucose uptake was observed in 65% of patients. The sites involved were pleural involvement, abdominal lymph nodes, liver, and spleen. Patients with immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions were objective responders according to iRECIST in 84% (n = 15/18) of patients, while only 15% had stable disease.
Conclusions
Immune-related sarcoidosis is characterized by the appearance of new mediastinal and/or pulmonary lesions, usually at 30 weeks after initiation of treatment, with stability of baseline target lesions. PET/CT demonstrated extrathoracic uptake in 65% of patients. This should not be misinterpreted as disease progressive since 84% of patients will show an objective response to ICI.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Ammari Sami.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S. Champiat: Advisory / Consultancy: Astrazenaca; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. J. Michot: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract