Abstract 5031
Background
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revealed a new panel of tumor response and adverse events. Immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions is frequently misdiagnosed as progressive or recurrent disease. This study aims to decipher the diagnosis hallmark of immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions as well as its association with patients’ outcome.
Methods
From August 2014 and December 2018, in a centralized single center review, we retrospectively included all patients with histologically proven immune-related sarcoidosis-like reaction during a treatment with ICI in monotherapy or combination. 54 variables were retrospectively recorded: clinical (n = 17), biological (n = 11) and radiological (n = 26), as well as the objective response to treatment using the best overall response according to iRECIST.
Results
Out of 3,200 patients treated with ICI, a total of 18 histologically proven sarcoidosis were diagnosed. The majority were female patients (n = 11/18) treated for melanoma (n = 14/18) or clear renal cell carcinoma (n = 3/18). The median [range] time to diagnosis of a sarcoidosis-like reaction was 30 [5-126] weeks after ICI treatment initiation. On CT-scans, the most common radiological findings were: absence of radiographical progression of the primary tumor per RECIST1.1 (100%), bilateral symmetrical mediastinal lymphadenopathy (100%), symmetrical hilar lymphadenopathy (84%), and micronodules with lymphatic distribution (15%). On PET-CT, an extrathoracic glucose uptake was observed in 65% of patients. The sites involved were pleural involvement, abdominal lymph nodes, liver, and spleen. Patients with immune-related sarcoidosis-like reactions were objective responders according to iRECIST in 84% (n = 15/18) of patients, while only 15% had stable disease.
Conclusions
Immune-related sarcoidosis is characterized by the appearance of new mediastinal and/or pulmonary lesions, usually at 30 weeks after initiation of treatment, with stability of baseline target lesions. PET/CT demonstrated extrathoracic uptake in 65% of patients. This should not be misinterpreted as disease progressive since 84% of patients will show an objective response to ICI.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Ammari Sami.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S. Champiat: Advisory / Consultancy: Astrazenaca; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. J. Michot: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract