Abstract 3736
Background
For decades, conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) was used after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Pivotal phase 3 trials on hypofractionated-WBI (HF-WBI) showed its non-inferiority as compared to CF-WBI. However, younger patients (<60 years) are not currently worldwide treated with HF-WBI. The aim of this multi-center comparative study is to confirm the safety of HF-WBI in a real-life series of younger patients.
Methods
Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 786 patients aged less than 60 years old with early stage breast cancer were treated with postoperative WBI after BCS in three breast cancer centers: 340 underwent HF-WBI while 446 were treated with CF-WBI. Acute toxicity was evaluated at the end of WBI. Late toxicity was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results
At univariate logistic analysis, hypofractionation showed a significant protective effect in terms of acute edema (p = 0.0001), acute wet desquamation (p = 0.009), chronic edema (p = 0.0001), chronic erythema/pigmentation (p = 0.0001), and breast fibrosis (p = 0.0002). At multivariate logistic analysis, hypofractionation was independent significant factor for acute edema (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.48; p = 0.005), acute wet desquamation (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.009 to 0.59; p = 0.014), and chronic edema (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.75; p = 0.018). Significant association between individual characteristics and toxicity (grade 2 or more) are summarized in Table.Table:
215P
| Toxicity | N | Protective factor | p-value | OR (95%CI) | Risk factor | p-value | OR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute edema | 43 | Hypofractionation Dmax/Prescribed dose° <107% | 0.0001 0.001 | 0.09 (0.03-0.30) 0.16 (0.06-0.46) | Chemotherapy | 0.002 | 2.63 (1.42-4.90) |
| Chronic edema | 50 | Hypofractionation Dmax/Prescribed dose° <107% | 0.0001 0.003 | 0.20 (0.09-0.44) 0.31 (0.14-0.66) | EIC presence Boost dose >10 Gy Breast size >492 cc | 0.0001 0.032 0.003 | 3.0 (1.66-5.46) 9.02 (1.21-67.45) 2.67 (1.41-5.05) |
| Acute erythema/ pigmentation | 163 | HER2 positive status Trastuzumab | 0.002 0.022 | 0.30 (0.14-0.63) 0.39 (0.18-0.87) | Smoking habits Boost dose >10 Gy Breast size >492 cc | 0.001 0.038 0.002 | 2.14 (1.37-3.32) 2.60 (1.06-6.41) 1.78 (1.24-2.54) |
| Chronic erythema/ pigmentation | 110 | Hypofractionation Dmax/Prescribed dose° <107% | 0.0001 0.001 | 0.40 (0.25-0.63) 0.45 (0.28-0.73) | EIC presence Positive FSM Boost dose >10 Gy Breast size >492 cc | 0.0001 0.002 0.007 0.034 | 2.39 (1.54-3.71) 3.47 (1.56-7.71) 15.43 (2.08-114.3) 1.58 (1.04-2.41) |
| Acute wet desquamation | 20 | Hypofractionation Dmax/Prescribed dose° <107% | 0.009 0.047 | 0.14 (0.03-0.61) 0.29 (0.08-0.99) | - | - | - |
| Breast fibrosis | 117 | Hypofractionation Tumor grade Ki67 index Dmax/Prescribed dose° <107% | 0.0002 0.022 0.023 0.017 | 0.44 (0.29-0.68) 0.53 (0.31-0.92) 0.60 (0.38-0.93) 0.58 (0.37-0.91) | EIC presence Boost dose >10 Gy Breast size >492 cc | 0.0001 0.022 0.0001 | 3.03 (1.99-4.62) 6.76 (2.04-22.45) 2.84 (1.83-4.41) |
Conclusions
HF-WBI showed significantly improved toxicity outcomes in terms of both acute skin edema and wet desquamation, and chronic skin edema. HF-WBI after BCS should replace CF-WBI independently of age.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3716 - Prognostic factors for predicting early recurrence within the first year of surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Naru Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3947 - Integrated population pharmacokinetic modelling of liposomal irinotecan in patients with various tumour types, including untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Teresa Macarulla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2880 - Expression of long noncoding RNA and clinical outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy by S-1 or GEM after curative resection.
Presenter: Mariko Kamiya
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5029 - POLO: Time to treatment discontinuation and subsequent therapies following maintenance olaparib for patients (pts) with a germline BRCA mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Eric Van Cutsem
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4730 - Diagnostic Value of Digital Multiplexed Detection of Single Nucleotide Variants in Pancreatic Cancer Specimens Collected by Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration
Presenter: Irina Cazacu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3303 - Phase I/II study of LDE225 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Esther Pijnappel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2009 - Efficacy of platinum-containing chemotherapy and prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiency: meta-analysis of published clinical studies
Presenter: Elizeveta Polyanskaya
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2164 - Plasmatic CXCL8 is a marker for TGFß-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) activation which may predict resistance to nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC) patients
Presenter: Valeria Merz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2529 - A protein level signature of four selected genes associated with survival outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jie Hua
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4947 - Pre-treatment serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and survival in a Danish cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Louise Rasmussen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract