Abstract 1500
Background
Docetaxel (Doc) was initially licenced for CRPC (TAX327) but more recently trials showed Doc at HSPC diagnosis improved survival, shifting patterns of use. Higher neutropenic toxicity rates were reported in the HSPC trials, but it is unclear if this was due to the Doc timing or differences in case-mix. We compared sepsis rates for Doc at HSPC and CRPC using routine NHS data for men randomised in STAMPEDE in England.
Methods
STAMPEDE patient data were linked to routine NHS data (Hospital Episode Statistics: HES; Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy: SACT). Patient note review (ref) linked to NHS data assessed admission rates by HSPC & CRPC Doc at 1 site (N = 44) and were used to develop and validate algorithms for detecting sepsis events across the entire data set. Algorithms were restricted to sepsis-only & sepsis + neutropenia (S+N) (N = 3645). Missing HES CRPC Doc regimens were imputed with HES (N = 3645) or enhanced with SACT (N = 1573). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for risk of sepsis (OR < 1 = lower risk for HSPC).
Results
Sepsis rates varied by method; for most, rates at CRPC were higher than in TAX327 but similar to or higher than reported STAMPEDE HSPC data.Table:
862P
HSPC Sepsis/Pts | CRPC Sepsis/Pts | % diff | OR, 95% CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | |||
Ref | ||||||
2/15 | 13 | 6/22 | 27 | -14 | 0.4 (0.1 - 2.1) | |
HES | ||||||
Sepsis | 69/834 | 8 | 114/1183 | 10 | -2 | 0.9 (0.6 - 1.2) |
S+N | 134/834 | 16 | 148/1183 | 13 | 3 | 1.3 (1.0 - 1.6) |
Imputed | 134/834 | 16 | 489/1351 | 36 | -20 | 0.4 (0.4 - 0.6) |
+ SACT | 41/200 | 21 | 60/297 | 20 | 1 | 1.0 (0.7 - 1.6) |
Conclusions
This analysis does not support the hypothesis that HSPC Doc has a higher sepsis risk than Doc use in CRPC. Sepsis rates found using routine data were higher than in the TAX327 trial but similar to reported “real world” CRPC data. Rates varied by data-identification method used; for most, CRPC sepsis rates were higher or similar to HSPC rates & overall a little higher than the reported STAMPEDE HSPC rate. These data suggest CRPC Doc has a similar or higher sepsis rate than use in HSPC & this should be factored into discussions for men with newly-diagnosed metastatic HSPC and supports Doc use in this setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The STAMPEDE Trial Group.
Funding
University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School (HM PhD studentship).
Disclosure
M.K.B. Parmar: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Clovis oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), The Unit I am Director of also receives educational grants and other non- financial support from a large number of different companies: Other. P. Patel: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech. M.R. Sydes: Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Clovis Oncology. N.D. James: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ferring; Honoraria (self): Oncogenex; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2963 - Analytical performance of the Resolution-HRD plasma assay used to identify mCRPC patients with biallelic disruption of DNA repair genes for treatment with niraparib
Presenter: Ira Pekker
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3523 - Results of a global external quality assessment scheme for EGFR testing on liquid biopsy
Presenter: Nicola Normanno
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3295 - Clinical impact of plasma Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Laura Bonanno
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5632 - Feasibility study of a ctEGFR prototype assay on the fully automated Idylla™ platform
Presenter: Martin Reijans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3614 - Enhanced Access to EGFR Molecular Testing in NSCLC using a Cell-Free DNA Tube for Liquid Biopsy
Presenter: Theresa May
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5664 - Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in paired plasma and sputum samples of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients
Presenter: Christina Grech
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4945 - Liquid biopsy and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH)
Presenter: Panagiotis Apostolou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5746 - Next-generation sequencing panel verification to detect low frequency single nucleotide and copy number variants from mixing cell line studies
Presenter: Rocio Rosas-Alonso
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5901 - Automated rarefaction analysis for precision B and T cell receptor repertoire profiling from peripheral blood and FFPE-preserved tumor
Presenter: Luca Quagliata
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2027 - A Heptamethine cyanine dye is a potential diagnostic marker for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
Presenter: Chaeyong Jung
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract