Abstract 1500
Background
Docetaxel (Doc) was initially licenced for CRPC (TAX327) but more recently trials showed Doc at HSPC diagnosis improved survival, shifting patterns of use. Higher neutropenic toxicity rates were reported in the HSPC trials, but it is unclear if this was due to the Doc timing or differences in case-mix. We compared sepsis rates for Doc at HSPC and CRPC using routine NHS data for men randomised in STAMPEDE in England.
Methods
STAMPEDE patient data were linked to routine NHS data (Hospital Episode Statistics: HES; Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy: SACT). Patient note review (ref) linked to NHS data assessed admission rates by HSPC & CRPC Doc at 1 site (N = 44) and were used to develop and validate algorithms for detecting sepsis events across the entire data set. Algorithms were restricted to sepsis-only & sepsis + neutropenia (S+N) (N = 3645). Missing HES CRPC Doc regimens were imputed with HES (N = 3645) or enhanced with SACT (N = 1573). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for risk of sepsis (OR < 1 = lower risk for HSPC).
Results
Sepsis rates varied by method; for most, rates at CRPC were higher than in TAX327 but similar to or higher than reported STAMPEDE HSPC data.Table:
862P
HSPC Sepsis/Pts | CRPC Sepsis/Pts | % diff | OR, 95% CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | |||
Ref | ||||||
2/15 | 13 | 6/22 | 27 | -14 | 0.4 (0.1 - 2.1) | |
HES | ||||||
Sepsis | 69/834 | 8 | 114/1183 | 10 | -2 | 0.9 (0.6 - 1.2) |
S+N | 134/834 | 16 | 148/1183 | 13 | 3 | 1.3 (1.0 - 1.6) |
Imputed | 134/834 | 16 | 489/1351 | 36 | -20 | 0.4 (0.4 - 0.6) |
+ SACT | 41/200 | 21 | 60/297 | 20 | 1 | 1.0 (0.7 - 1.6) |
Conclusions
This analysis does not support the hypothesis that HSPC Doc has a higher sepsis risk than Doc use in CRPC. Sepsis rates found using routine data were higher than in the TAX327 trial but similar to reported “real world” CRPC data. Rates varied by data-identification method used; for most, CRPC sepsis rates were higher or similar to HSPC rates & overall a little higher than the reported STAMPEDE HSPC rate. These data suggest CRPC Doc has a similar or higher sepsis rate than use in HSPC & this should be factored into discussions for men with newly-diagnosed metastatic HSPC and supports Doc use in this setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The STAMPEDE Trial Group.
Funding
University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School (HM PhD studentship).
Disclosure
M.K.B. Parmar: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Clovis oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), The Unit I am Director of also receives educational grants and other non- financial support from a large number of different companies: Other. P. Patel: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech. M.R. Sydes: Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Clovis Oncology. N.D. James: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ferring; Honoraria (self): Oncogenex; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2036 - Salivary metabolomics for colorectal cancer detection
Presenter: Hiroshi Kuwabara
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1868 - Evaluation and diagnostic potential of plasma biomarkers in bladder cancer
Presenter: Veronika Voronova
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3655 - Liquid biopsy assays using combined circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA in the same patients for the diagnosis of primary lung cancer
Presenter: Yongjoon Suh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3685 - Peripheral Cytotoxic T Cell Correlates with Tumor Mutational Burden and is Predictive for Progression Free Survival in Advanced Breast Cancer
Presenter: Xiao-ran Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1050 - Splenic Metabolic Activity as Biomarker in Cervical Cancer
Presenter: Emiel De Jaeghere
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1413 - Identification of distinct subtypes revealing prognostic and therapeutic relevance in diffuse type gastric cancer
Presenter: Seon-Kyu Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2140 - Recurrence risk evaluation in stage IB/IIA gastric cancer with TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms
Presenter: Satoshi Nishizuka
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1573 - Identification and validation of a prognostic 4 genes signature for hepatocellular carcinoma: integrated ceRNA network analysis
Presenter: Yongcong Yan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1196 - Plasma KIM-1 is associated with clinical outcomes after resection for localized renal cell carcinoma: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E2805)
Presenter: Wenxin Xu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2657 - Prognostic immunoprofiling of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients in a multicentre setting
Presenter: Katharina Nekolla
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract