Abstract 851
Background
The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) and Gustave Roussy Institute (GRIm) have prospectively validated prognostic scores to aide patient selection for phase I immunotherapy trials in many tumour sites, including NSCLC. These include number of metastatic sites, LDH, Albumin and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR). GRIm score stratified 155 patients to high-risk and low-risk categories, according to LDH, Albumin and NLR, with median OS of 4 months in high-risk cohort and 17 months in low-risk group. NSCLC was the predominant tumour site in this analysis including 30 stage IV patients. This score had similar design to RMH score, except for number of metastatic sites instead of NLR.
Methods
165 consecutive Nottinghamshire patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC on PD1/PDL1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors from December 2015 to December 2018 have been retrospectively analysed. At data cut-off in April 2019, 148 - 151 patients were censored for median TTF, PFS and OS, according to GRIm - RMH scores respectively: 17 patients were unclassified into GRIm (10.3%) and 14, into RMH (8.5%) for LDH unavailability; 70 patients remain alive (42.4%), 31 of whom still receiving immunotherapy (18.8%).
Results
Table:
1508P
mTTF (cycles) | mPFS (months) | mOS (months) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GRIm score | 0-1 80 patients (95% CI) Pembrolizumab-61 p Atezolizumab-13 p Nivolumab-3 p | 9 (9-13) 9 (7.5-11) 7 (4.6-10.5) 6 | 7 (6.9-10) 7 (7.5-11) 6 (3.6-7.3) 3 | 10 (10-13.5) 11 (11-15) 7.5 (5.2-9.1) 6 |
2-3 68 patients (95% CI) Pembrolizumab-59 p Atezolizumab-6 p Nivolumab-3 p | 3 (3.8-7) 3 (4-7.5) 3.5 (0.3-8.1) 1 | 2 (3-5.7) 2 (3-6.1) 3 (0.04 - 5.4) 1 | 4 (5.1-8.6) 5 (5-9.1) 6 (1.3-10) 1 | |
RMH score | 0-1 93 patients (95% CI) Pembrolizumab-78 p Atezolizumab-12 p Nivolumab-3 p | 9 (8.6-12.4) 8 (8.8-13.2) 11 (4.7-12.1) 6 | 7 (6.9-9.9) 6.5 (7.2-10.7) 7 (3.3-8) 3 | 10 (10-13.5) 11 (10.6-14.6) 8 (5.5-9.5) 6 |
2-3 58 patients (95% CI) Pembrolizumab-46 p Atezolizumab-9 p Nivolumab-3 p | 2.5 (3.4-7) 3 (3.7-8.1) 2 (1.35-4.2) 1 | 2 (2.6-5.4) 2.5 (2.8-6.2) 3 (0.9-3.4) 1 | 3 (4.5-7.9) 4 (4.8-9) 3 (1.7-7.3) 1 |
Conclusions
GRIm / RMH scores on our population have consistently shown predictive and prognostic relevance, with more favourable TTF, PFS and OS in low-risk groups across any immunotherapy. On treatment stratification, Atezolizumab outcomes show better correlation with RMH score and Nivolumab remains underrepresented at our centre. Our results are consistent with international multi-institutional studies at Gustave Roussy (France) on Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) and Princess Alexandra Hospital (Australia) on modified LIPI. Disease control has been observed when immune-related adverse events have occurred, suggesting baseline autoimmune antibodies may be predictive of response and immune-related toxicity, a currently open line of observational prospective research.
Clinical trial identification
Not applicable
Editorial acknowledgement
No editorial assistance in the writing of the abstract to be declared
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust at UK.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4139 - Patient (pt) selection for immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single Phase I Unit experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract