Abstract 3523
Background
Cell free DNA (cfDNA) testing of EGFR mutations is widely employed in lung cancer patients. Liquid biopsy testing is highly challenging due to the low level of mutant DNA present with normal DNA. Therefore, cfDNA testing requires quality assessment to ensure patient safety. The international external quality assessment (EQA) provider consortium, IQNPath has delivered a second successful EQA run to determine the standard of cfDNA testing for EGFR mutations.
Methods
Five European EQA providers (AIOM, EMQN, ESP, Gen&Tiss, UKNEQAS), under the umbrella of IQNPath, collaborated to deliver the assessment during 2018-19 to a total of 310 laboratories from 44 countries. A panel of bespoke manufactured plasma samples with varying EGFR mutations at a range of allelic frequencies were validated by a range of methodologies prior to distribution to ensure stability and reproducibility. The EQA samples were supplied for testing and reporting according to laboratory routine protocols. Peer reviewed criteria was applied to assess the standard of genotyping and reporting.
Results
Of the 310 laboratories that had joined the program, 270 submitted the results within the established deadline. Preliminary analysis of the data submitted by participating laboratories showed that low allelic frequency samples were the most challenging and some methods did not detect these mutations. Reporting of such cases often did not address the risk that tumour DNA may have not been tested and limitations of the testing performed was not addressed when reporting the result. The final results of the EQA scheme will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusions
The variability in the standard of genotyping and reporting highlights the need for EQA in this field and educational guidance to ensure the delivery of high-quality clinical service where testing of cfDNA is the only option for clinical management.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
IQNPath.
Funding
IQNPath.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract