Abstract 4082
Background
EGFR-TKIs are the preferred 1L therapy for pts with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. However, treatment and survival in this population with 2L therapy and beyond are not well defined in the RW setting. To address this, we analysed RW cohort data in the USA, UK, Germany and France.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted for 472 pts with EGFRm NSCLC receiving a 1L 1G / 2G EGFR-TKI (1 Jan 2015–31 Dec 2017). Data on 1L and 2L treatment and progression after 1L initiation (defined by clinical progression, start of 2L treatment or death before 2L treatment initiation) were extracted. 1L progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan–Meier methods.
Results
Baseline characteristics at 1L: median age 62 yrs; 43% female; 61% current/former smokers; 60% Caucasian; 76% Exon 19 deletion. 1L EGFR-TKI treatments: 44% afatinib; 36% erlotinib; 21% gefitinib. Median duration of overall follow-up from start of 1L was 19.9 months (mo; range 0.3–50.3). Of 472 pts, 344 (73%) progressed on 1L treatment, including 158 who died during follow-up. 128 (27%) pts did not progress: 86 (18%) remained on 1L treatment and 42 (9%) pts discontinued 1L treatment before follow-up end. Median 1L PFS (95% CI) was 14.5 (13.3, 15.6) mo and median OS (95% CI) from start of 1L was 34.6 (29.5, 45.5) mo. Of 344 pts with 1L progression, 255 (74%) were tested for T790M; 129 (38%) were positive, of whom 97 received osimertinib (75%). Of 126 pts testing negative, 17 (13%) received osimertinib. Of 344 pts with 1L progression, 258 (75%) received 2L treatment, osimertinib-containing regimens being most common (n = 109/258, 42%). For 86 (25%) pts with 1L progression but no 2L treatment, 73 (85%) died and 13 (15%) were alive at follow-up end.
Conclusions
25% of pts progressing on 1L EGFR-TKIs did not receive 2L treatment (due to death in most cases). Furthermore, 25% of pts who progressed on 1L treatment and tested T790M positive did not receive osimertinib. Findings indicate that rates of resistance mutation testing and utilisation of effective EGFRm NSCLC therapies may be suboptimal.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Robert Harrison, PhD, of iMed Comms, Macclesfield, UK, an Ashfield Company; funded by AstraZeneca.
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
R. Shah: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. N. Girard: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. S.P. Nagar: Advisory / Consultancy, Employee of RTI-HS who provides consulting services to AstraZeneca: AstraZeneca. F. Griesinger: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, Lilly, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Siemens; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AbbVie. J. Roeper: Honoraria (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. K. Davis: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Sanofi, Pfizer, Amgen. N. Bakker: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. B. Thakrar: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. A. Taylor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. J. Feliciano: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly.
Resources from the same session
2728 - MicroRNA expression and DNA methylation profiles do not distinguish between primary and recurrent well-differentiated liposarcoma
Presenter: Melissa Vos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3197 - Genomic Alterations, Tumor Mutation Burden and Prognosis of Chinese Cardiac Sarcoma Patients
Presenter: Na Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4214 - Evaluation of a peptide-conjugated alkylator melflufen in osteosarcoma preclinical models
Presenter: Konstantin Byrgazov
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2654 - Expression analysis of NHEJ and HR genes in Ewing sarcomas: indications of DSB repair dysfunction
Presenter: Anastasios Kyriazoglou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4383 - Epidemiology of Synovial Sarcoma in EU28 countries
Presenter: Nedra Joseph
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1937 - Resection Of High-Grade Large Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Adequate Wide Margin Can Lead To Good Local Control Without Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Presenter: Toshiyuki Kunisada
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3757 - Influence of eribulin on proliferation, migration and invasion properties of leiomyosarcoma cell line models
Presenter: Marta Mendiola
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1040 - EREMISS: Efficacy of regorafenib (REG) as maintenance therapy in non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) having received 1st-line doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (Doxo-CT)
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1048 - A Phase 2 biomarker-driven study evaluating the clinical efficacy of an MDM2 inhibitor, milademetan, in patients with intimal sarcoma, a disease with a high unmet need
Presenter: Kan Yonemori
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1511 - A pilot study of oral paclitaxel (ORAXOL) in subjects with cutaneous angiosarcomas (KX-ORAX-010)
Presenter: Herbert Loong
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract