Abstract 5306
Background
The etiologic role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is well established and it explains the increase of young patients (pts) affected with OPC. This is an observational study representing a real-world experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and prognosis in young (<45 years old) OPC pts compared with older ones (≥45).
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pts diagnosed with OPC in four Catalonian hospitals from 1991 to 2017. Data was collected from medical records. Unconditional logistic regression was used to compare age groups and Proportional hazards model (Cox regression) and Cumulative Incident Function (CIF) to analyze OPC-specific survival (OPC-sS) in locally advanced cases.
Results
A total of 865 pts were included, 49 in the young group (median age 42; range 28.5-45.0) and 816 in the old group (median age 61; range 45.1-93.9). There were no differences between age groups in terms of sex, anatomic subsite, toxic habits, HPV status (positivity defined as double p16/DNA positivity) or stage at diagnosis. There were more non-smokers HPV-related (HPV+) OPC pts than HPV-negative (HPV-) ones (p-value <0.001) in both age groups. Median follow-up was 2.24 years (0-22). Trend test showed that HPV+ OPC in the young group increased with time period but the proportion of young pts decreased (p-values = 0.034 and 0.027, respectively). In terms OPC-sS women (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41-0.93) had better prognosis compared to men. In contrast, smoker and drinker pts had worse prognosis estimates (HR 1.68 [95%CI 1.13-2.51] and HR 1.77 [95%CI 1.26-2.48], respectively) compared to non-smoker and non-drinker pts. In the restricted analysis for the young pts these differences did not reach the significance. No differences in the OPC-sS were observed by age group (HR 0.78 [95%CI 0.49-1.25]). CIF showed better OPC-sS in HPV+ OPC pts compared to HPV- ones, independently of the age. No differences by age were observed in the restricted analysis for HPV+ OPC pts. Nevertheless, none of the young HPV+ OPC pts died in the follow-up compared with a 16.4% of cancer-related deaths in the HPV+ old group.
Conclusions
HPV is the most important prognostic factor in OPC independent of age.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ICO (Catalan Institute of Oncology).
Funding
The Instituto de Salud Carlos III-ISCIII (Spanish Government) co funded by EDER funds/ European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) - a way to build Europe (References: PI1102096, PI1401918, PI1500500, PI1501205, RD12/0036/0056, CIBERESP, CIBERONC).
Disclosure
M. Nieva: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck. S. Tous: Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK.: GSK; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK.: Seegene; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK.: Merck. M. Mena: Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: GSK; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: Seegene. R. Mesia Nin: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Nanobiotix. L. Alemany: Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: GSK; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: Seegene; Research grant / Funding (institution), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (ST LA MM) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck and co, Seegene and GSK: Merck. M. Taberna: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AZ; Advisory / Consultancy: Nanobiotics; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol Myers. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract