Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4317 - Prognostic factors analysis of 343 patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Yixun Lu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4099 - Effects of preoperative preparation time on efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Xinxin Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3769 - The prognostic value of higher absolute lymphocyte counts for patients with surgically resected non-advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1718 - Trastuzumab and pertuzumab added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable HER2+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients: an update on survival and predictive biomarkers in the TRAP study
Presenter: Charlotte Stroes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5403 - Interim analysis of a phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy plus avelumab in esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Thierry Alcindor
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
591 - Evaluation of the introduction of primary G-CSF prophylaxis to the FLOT chemotherapy regimen.
Presenter: Kelly-Marie Crampton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1402 - Subgroup analyses of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 2 and 4 courses of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Tsutomu Hayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3743 - HER2 Copy Number as Predictor of Disease-Free Survival in HER2-Positive Resectable Gastric Cancer
Presenter: Zimin Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2032 - Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the Programmed Death-1 pathway in esophageal and gastric cancer
Presenter: Maria Svensson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4304 - A user-friendly nomogram to predict relapse-free survival (RFS) in western patients with resected gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Massimiliano Salati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract