Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5124 - STAR_PAC: Phase I clinical trial repurposing all trans retinoic acid (ATRA) as stromal targeting agent in a novel drug combination for pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Hemant Kocher
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5257 - Outcomes of First Line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) Versus Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel (GN) in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-Institutional Canadian Sites Experience
Presenter: Neha Papneja
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1166 - Effect of prior cancer on survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Chaobin He
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1169 - Association of combination of irreversible electroporation ablation and chemotherapy with outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a large cohort study
Presenter: Chaobin He
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1222 - Results from phase I study of the oncolytic viral immunotherapy agent Canerpaturev (C-REV) in combination with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yusuke Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1698 - Multicenter retrospective study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Masato Ozaka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2424 - Irinotecan Combined with Oxaliplatin and S1 in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Keke Nie
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2885 - Cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with pancreatic cancer and its correlation with plasma tissue factor level: A Japanese prospective cohort study
Presenter: Satoshi Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3702 - A Phase I/Ib, multi-center trial of ARQ-761 (Beta-Lapachone) with gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Muhammad Beg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5185 - Systemic administration of the hyaluronidase-expressing oncolytic adenovirus VCN-01 in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: first-in-human clinical trial
Presenter: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract