Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5489 - Local immune status in cancer cell nests can be a predictor of survival for rectal cancer with neoadjuvant radiotherapy
Presenter: xijin lin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1653 - Impact of concomitant medications on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients from the PETACC8 study.
Presenter: Clémence Brun
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5206 - Updated results of NORDIC 8, a randomised trial of cetuximab every 2 weeks with FOLFIRI or cetuximab with alternating FOLFIRI/FOLFOX in patients with RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Per Pfeiffer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2992 - Clinical impact of mucinous and poorly differentiated tumors on the outcome of patients with stage II colon cancer: a TOSCA subgroup analysis
Presenter: Gerardo Rosati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4753 - Exercise improved adjuvant treatment completion rates and treatment-related toxicities in colorectal cancer: A prospective pilot study
Presenter: Hong Jun Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2735 - Bevacizumab plus Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer (CC): Updated analysis of stage II disease from the AVANT Phase III Randomized trial by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Aimery De Gramont
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1843 - Multicenter Validation of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Combined Prognostic Model for Stage Ⅲ Colon Cancer
Presenter: Ji Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2554 - Impact of the IDEA study on clinical practice for stage III colon cancer patients: a French GERCOR - FFCD - GI UNICANCER national survey.
Presenter: Kaissa Ouali
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3285 - Sex hormones and sperm parameters after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based treatment for colorectal cancer
Presenter: Philip Falk
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract