Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1309 - Quantifying the Effects of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program on Cervical Cancer Mortality
Presenter: Nhung Bui
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1346 - Spread of tumor and adverse events after modified radical hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor diameter preoperatively estimated 2 cm or less: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1101); exploratory analysis before primary analysis.
Presenter: Takahide Arimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5352 - Impact of Combined Interstitial and Intracavitary Brachytherapy in locally advanced Cervical cancer: A Survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2049 - Chemoradiotherapy response prediction model by proteomic expressional profiling in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Chel Hun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1923 - Disparities starting adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer in the international, academic, randomised, phase 3 OUTBACK trial (ANZGOG 0902, RTOG 1174, NRG 0274)
Presenter: Linda Mileshkin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3284 - Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC)
Presenter: Andres Redondo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
843 - Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Xiaobin Gu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1020 - Clinical impact of molecular profiling of cervical cancer (CC) patients (pts) in a dedicated Phase I (P1) unit
Presenter: Mariana Scaranti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
872 - Comparative proteomic profiles of cervical cancer and paried paracancerous tissue and the potential effects of DUSP7 over-expression through inhibiting RAS pathway on the biological characteristics of human cervical cancer cell line SIHA
Presenter: Xuan Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1988 - Molecular profiling reveals novel targetable biomarkers in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Presenter: Semir Vranic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract