Abstract 1451
Background
Avelumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PD-L1, and axitinib is a potent inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2, and 3. In a phase 3 study in patients (pts) with treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC; NCT02684006), avelumab in combination with axitinib (A+Ax) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) irrespective of PD-L1 expression vs sunitinib (S) at the preplanned interim analysis; median PFS was 13.8 mo with A+Ax vs 8.4 mo with S (HR, 0.69; p = 0.0001). Here, we report efficacy and safety in Japanese pts who were enrolled in this study.
Methods
Eligible pts with clear-cell aRCC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no prior systemic therapy were randomized 1:1 (stratified by ECOG PS and geographic region) to receive A 10 mg/kg IV Q2W + Ax 5 mg PO BID or S 50 mg PO QD on schedule 4/2. Primary endpoints were PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS) in pts with PD-L1+ tumors (≥1% of immune cells). Key secondary endpoints were PFS by BICR and OS irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results
Japanese pts (N = 67) were randomized to A+Ax (n = 33) or S (n = 34); 67% vs 59% had PD-L1+ tumors; IMDC favorable/intermediate/poor risk status was 6%/64%/27% vs 6%/82%/12%. Median PFS (95% CI) was not estimable (NE) (8.1-NE) with A+Ax vs 11.2 months (1.6-NE) with S (HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.15-1.56) in pts with PD-L1+ tumors and 16.6 mo (8.1-NE) with A+Ax vs 11.2 mo (4.2-NE) with S (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.30-1.46) in pts irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Median OS in either arm has not been reached in pts irrespective of PD-L1 expression. ORR (95% CI) was 60.6% (42.1%-77.1%) with A+Ax vs 17.6% (6.8%-34.5%) with S in pts irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grade; grade ≥3) in each arm were hand-foot syndrome (64%; 9% vs 71%; 9%), hypertension (55%; 30% vs 44%; 18%), hypothyroidism (55%; 0% vs 24%; 0%), dysgeusia (21%; 0% vs 56%; 0%), and platelet count decreased (3%; 0% vs 65%; 32%).
Conclusions
A+Ax was efficacious and tolerable in Japanese pts with treatment-naive aRCC, which is consistent with results in the overall population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02684006, Feb 17, 2016.
Editorial acknowledgement
Clinical Thinking, a Nucleus Global Company, Hamilton, NJ, USA.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Pfizer, Inc.
Funding
Funding for this study was provided by Pfizer, Inc. in alliance with Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Disclosure
Y. Tomita: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self): Sanofi-Aventis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Taiho; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda. S. Hatakeyama: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Kissei; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Kaneka. H. Kanayama: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. K. Numakura: Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharm; Honoraria (self): Kyowa Kirin; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, the ministry of Education, Japan. T. Kato: Honoraria (self): Pfizer, Inc.; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma K.K; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): TAIHO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma Inc. M. Eto: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer. H. Uemura: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ono; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self): Taiho; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono. R.J. Motzer: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer, Inc.; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck. Y. Fujii: Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer R&D Japan. Y. Kamei: Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer R&D Japan. M. Oya: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self): Ono; Honoraria (self): BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract