Abstract 3502
Background
Pts with unresectable HCC have few treatment (tx) options. Checkpoint inhibitors and combination approaches with anti-VEGFs are emerging as potential new tx options. Here we report the first randomised dataset evaluating atezo (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy vs the combination of atezo + bev (anti-VEGF; Arm F) as well as updated single-arm atezo + bev data (Arm A) from a Ph 1b study.
Methods
Arms F and A of the Ph 1b study GO30140 enrolled systemic tx-naïve pts with unresectable HCC. Arm F pts were randomised 1:1 to atezo + bev or atezo monotherapy and received atezo 1200 mg IV q3w, bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. Arm A pts received atezo + bev. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS; Arm F) and objective response rate (ORR, Arm A) by independent review facility (IRF)-assessed RECIST 1.1, and safety (Arms F and A).
Results
In Arm F, 60 pts were randomised to atezo + bev (Group F1) and 59 pts to atezo (Group F2). Arm F showed a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint median PFS for atezo + bev vs atezo (5.6 vs 3.4 mo, HR 0.55, 80% CI, 0.40 – 0.74, P = 0.0108). Any-Gr TRAEs occurred in 41 (68%) F1 pts and 24 (41%) F2 pts; Gr 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 12 (20%) F1 pts and 3 (5%) F2 pts. There were no Gr 5 TRAEs in Arm F. For the 104 pts in Arm A, primary endpoint ORR was 36% (37 pts) with 76% ongoing. Any-Grade (Gr) tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 91 (88%) pts; Gr 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 41 (39%) pts. Gr 5 TRAEs were seen in 3 (3%) pts.
Conclusions
By meeting its primary endpoint of improved PFS for atezo + bev vs atezo alone, Arm F showed the single-agent contribution of atezo and bev to the overall tx effect. With longer follow up, Arm A highlights the clinically meaningful and durable responses of atezo + bev. Coupled with a tolerable safety profile, these data suggest that atezo + bev is a promising first-line tx option for unresectable HCC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02715531.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing assistance was provided by Steffen Biechele, PhD, of Health Interactions and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.
Disclosure
M. Lee: Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb ; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech/Roche. C. Hsu: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. S. Stein: Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis. W. Verret: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech/Roche. S. Hack: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genentech/Roche. J. Spahn: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genentech/Roche. B. Liu: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genentech/Roche. H. Abdullah: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech/Roche. R. He: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai Inc.; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Exelixis Inc; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck & Co; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ. K. Lee: Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Honoraria (self): Samsung Bioepis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Table:
LBA39
Arm F | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
IRF RECIST 1.1 | IRF HCC mRECIST | |||
F1 Atezo + Bev (n = 60) | F2 Atezo (n = 59)a | F1 Atezo + Bev (n = 60) | F2 Atezo (n = 59)a | |
Median follow-up, mo | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Median PFS, mo 95% CI | 5.6b 3.6 – 7.4 | 3.4b 1.9 – 5.2 | 5.6 3.6 – 7.4 | 3.4 1.9 – 5.2 |
HR | 0.55b | 0.54 | ||
80% CI | 0.40 – 0.74 P = 0.0108 | 0.40 – 0.74 | ||
Arm A: Atezo + Bev | ||||
n = 104 | ||||
IRF RECIST 1.1 | IRF HCC mRECIST | |||
Median follow-up, mo | 12.4 | |||
Confirmed ORR, n (%) | 37 (36)b | 41 (39) | ||
95% CI (%) | 26 – 46 | 30 – 50 | ||
Complete Response (CR), n (%) | 12 (12) | 16 (15) | ||
Partial Response (PR), n (%) | 25 (24) | 25 (24) | ||
On-going response, n (%) | 28 (76) | 28 (68) | ||
DCR (CR + PR + SD), n (%) | 74 (71) | 74 (71) | ||
Median DOR, mo | NE | NE | ||
95% CI | 11.8 – NE | 11.8 – NE | ||
Median PFS, mo | 7.3 | 7.3 | ||
95% CI | 5.4 – 9.9 | 5.4 – 9.9 |
DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; NE, not estimable; SD, stable disease. Data cut off: 14 June 2019.
a1 randomised pt did not receive atezo.
bPrimary endpoint.
Resources from the same session
2449 - Conversion rate in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine- or FOLFIRINOX-based induction chemotherapy (NEOLAP) - Final Results of a multicenter randomised Phase 2 AIO trial -
Presenter: Volker Kunzmann
Session: Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
6572 - CheckMate 459: A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (NIVO) vs Sorafenib (SOR) as First-Line (1L) Treatment in Patients (pts) With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA38_PR and LBA39
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
2550 - FIGHT-202: a phase 2 study of pemigatinib in patients (pts) with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant 671O and LBA40
Presenter: Per Pfeiffer
Session: Proffered Paper 1 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast