Abstract 3958
Background
Digestive Cancers Europe (DiCE), a European digestive cancer patients umbrella organization, planned and executed a cross-sectional survey in 15 European countries on the Unmet Needs of Patients Living with mCRC to examine the challenges and needs and QoL of those living with mCRC.
Methods
DiCE partner organisations, together with clinicians and nurses recruited patients for the survey (paper-based and online). The survey included demographics, data on discovery of the disease, diagnosis and treatment and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29. Single data entry from the paper surveys was done by DiCE. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were run to examine the global QoL score, function (F) - and symptom-specific scores, the item on financial difficulties and CR29 scores and their association with patient and disease characteristics and care setting by country and overall.
Results
883 surveys from Austria, Belgium, Cyprus (CY), Germany, Hungary (HU), Italy, Netherlands (NL), Norway, Serbia (RS), Poland, Spain (SP), UK, Portugal, Turkey and Ireland were collected. Only 8 countries with samples over 35 were analyzed on their own. Completion rates across QoL items were high (91-94%). Large variation across countries have been observed in mean scores (Table). Eastern vs Western Europe contrasted sharply, with Serbia and Poland reporting lower functional and much higher symptom scores for fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain and insomnia. Regression analyses indicated that after adjustment for age, gender and care setting country differences remained significant. Patterns in results across dimensions of EORTC QLQ-CR29 were similar.Table:
659P
Mean (SD) | Global QoL | Physical F | Role F | Emotional F | Cognitive F | Social F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lowest score | 55.94 (21.10) RS | 69.06 (23.93) CY | 62.58 (34.73) CY | 53.51 (28.35) RS | 71.31 (24.6) RS | 54.04 (25.91) RS |
Highest score | 69.26 (20.68) HU | 84.29 (17.87) SP | 81.76 (25.41) SP | 80.92 (21.04) NL | 87.86 (19.13) HU | 80.91 (24.63) HU |
OVERALL | 62.02 (21.75) | 74.25 (20.85) | 71.41 (28.76) | 68.25 (26.41) | 78.58 (23.39) | 68.56 (28.99) |
Conclusions
Country specific mean QoL scores in all function/symptom dimensions varied greatly across countries. This study indicates that care setting and other country-specific circumstances have important associations to QoL. Real-world mCRC patients’ QoL may be lower than those recruited in clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
EuropaColon / Digestive Cancers Europe.
Funding
Merck, BMS, Sandoz and Sirtex.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract