Abstract 3127
Background
In humans Tregs lack a unique phenotypic marker and Foxp3 expression in cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25high T lymphocytes is commonly used for their characterization. In early colorectal cancer, the presence of Tregs in CRC tumour tissue has been associated with favourable prognosis. However, the prognostic role of circulating Tregs in CRC patients and especially in the metastatic setting is not yet clear.
Methods
We collected peripheral blood from 57 patients with mCRC before initiation of first line chemotherapy. Samples were analysed with multicolour flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against CD3, CD4, CD25, and FoxP3. The ratio of FoxP3 positive cells within the CD3+CD4+CD25high lymphocytic subpopulation (F/H ratio) was measured and quartile analysis according to this ratio was carried out. Overall survival was calculated from initiation of first line chemotherapy to death or last follow up. Median OS (mOS) was compared between the highest quartile and the rest using the Breslow (Generalized Wilcoxon) method. Ratios were compared between groups with the Mann Whitney U-test. Statistics were analyzed with SPSS and flow cytometry data with Kaluza 2.1.
Results
The median F/H ratio was 0,08 (Interquartile range 0,018-0,34) with a distribution skewed to the right (range 0 to 0.85). For each quartile mOS is shown in the table. The mOS for the highest quartile was 8 months (m) (95% Confidence Interval(CI) 0 - 20.6m) and 25m for the rest (95% CI 18.2m-31.8m)(p = 0.03). No difference was observed in F/H ratio in different groups according to KRAS/NRAS mutations’ status, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, performance status or sidedness of primary site.Table:
610P
Quartile | F/H ratio (range) | n | mOS (m) | mOS(m) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 0-0,018 | 14 | 24 | 25 | |
2nd | 0,0181-0,08 | 15 | 34 | ||
3rd | 0,0810-0,34 | 15 | 24 | ||
4th | 0,3410-0,85 | 13 | 8 | 0.03 |
Conclusions
The F/H ratio in patients with mCRC is spread over a wide range of values with the majority below 0.1. High values (>0.34) seem to have prognostic significance and be associated with worse outcome.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Medical School, University of Crete.
Funding
Hellenic Oncology Research Group, Medical School, University of Crete.
Disclosure
Z. Zafeiriou: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol. A. Koutoulaki: Full / Part-time employment: Genesis Pharma. V. Georgoulias: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2860 - Prognostic value of metabolic response assessed by 18FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (pts) receiving definite CRT (dCRT)
Presenter: Yeonghak Bang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3881 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jing Zuo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3944 - A novel nomogram and risk classification system predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiotherapy
Presenter: Lu Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1956 - Drinking alcohol, smoking, multiple dysplastic lesions and the risk of field cancerization of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus and head and neck region
Presenter: Chikatoshi Katada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2144 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications on recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Kazuki Kano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2403 - Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus definitive CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Marcelle Cesca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3247 - Paclitaxel in Combination with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil(TPF) Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-resectable Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Presenter: Yuhong Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4293 - Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on local immunity evaluation
Presenter: Elena Zlatnik
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5419 - Impact of Sarcopenia and adiposity in survival of metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC)
Presenter: Aline Fares
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2083 - PALAESTRA - A phase II trial with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy as palliative treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: David Borg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract