Abstract 4523
Background
Ipilimumab (Ip) is an option in Metastatic Melanoma (MM) patients (pt) in case of disease progression after antiPD1 (AP) treatment and BRAF+MEK inhibitors (BMi) administration (for BRAF mutated melanoma). Clinical trial are evaluating potential Ip-based combinations in 2nd/3rd line setting. Many studies underline the role of some parameters (as LDH, ECOG PS, Neutrophile/Leucocyte ratio) as progostic factors for immunotherapy used in first-line. We evaluate the prognostic role of some relevant clinical or laboratoristic parameters for Ip used in late line after AP, Bmi, in order to define pt that benefit most from Ip monotherapy in this setting.
Methods
A retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 8 Italian Oncology Centers, evaluating MM pt treated with Ip after AP and/or BMi. Endpoints were OS and PFS, Kaplan Mayer and Cox regression were applied for survival analysis.
Results
Among 200 pt that received AP or Bmi, 48 were eligible for Ip administration in 2nd/3rd line. Before Ip treatment, ECOG PS was 0 in 21 pt, number of metastatic sites was less then 3 in 14 pt, LDH was within normal range in 19 pt, NLR ratio (= baseline neutrophils/total leukocytes) was less then 0.7 in 28 pt: in univariate analysis, only ECOG PS and NLR resulted significantly associated with better PFS and OS. For pt with ECOG PS 0 or 1 medianPFS was 3.2, 2.3 month respectively (p value 0.0066; HR 0.377 IC95% 0.186-0.762), median OS was 12.1, 4.0 respectively (p value 0.0016 HR 0.287 IC95% 0.132-0.622). For pt with NLR <0,7 or > 0,7 medianPFS was 3.2, 2.0 month respectively (p value 0.002 HR 0.241 IC95% 0.0978-0.593), median OS was 7.63, 2.67 respectively (p value 0.0037 HR 0.251 IC95% 0.0986-0.0637) A score was counted for each pt considering the number of favorable basal factors present (ECOG PS 0, NLR<0.7), from 0 to 2. For pt with SCORE 0,1,2 medianPFS was 4.8, 2.4, 1.4 month respectively (p value 0.0009), median OS was 25.6, 5.8, 1.9 respectively (p value <0.0001).
Conclusions
ECOG PS 0, NLR <0.7, resulted prognostic factors associated with favorable PFS and OS of MM pt treated with Ip after AP or BMi progression. Subgroup with all these factors has a better prognosis. These data can help treatment choice and should be evaluated prospectively.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Italian Melanoma Intergroup.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Marconcini: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: La Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3839 - Fenofibrate impairs pro-tumorigenic potential of cancer stem cell-like cells within drug-resistant prostate cancer cell populations.
Presenter: Tomasz Wróbel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3842 - Effect of docetaxel-resistance on the reactivity of prostate cancer cells to metformin
Presenter: Jessica Catapano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5198 - Cell plasticity and taxanes resistance in metastatic prostate cancer: ESRP1 as a predictive biomarker of taxane response
Presenter: Natalia Jimenez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2981 - Effect of Selumetinib plus AZD8186 treatment on Cabazitaxel sensitivity in docetaxel-acquired resistant metastatic prostate cancer cell lines
Presenter: Vicenc Ruiz de Porras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2779 - Anti-tumor activity of cediranib, a pan-inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells
Presenter: Majid Momeny
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1782 - The molecular mechanisms of EpCAM in regulating tumor progression and development of anti-EpCAM antibodies for colon cancer diagnosis and therapy
Presenter: Han-chung Wu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1322 - Detection of microRNAs as biomarker for anti-EGFR antibody resistance in colon cancer patients
Presenter: Jens Hahne
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1579 - Serum exosomal microRNA-199b-5p as a novel circulating biomarker to predict response of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Dong Won Baek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1761 - Live biobank of patient-derived organoids from Thai colorectal cancer patients enables clinical outcome prediction
Presenter: Pariyada Tanjak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3542 - The biological implications of PDCD6 dysregulation in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Romina Briffa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract