Abstract 2698
Background
Triple negative breast cancers are a heterogeneous group of breast cancer candidate to adjuvant chemotherapy in a large majority of cases. However, literature data indicate that the diagnosis of special types of breast cancer might be associated with a different outcome if compared with invasive ductal carcinoma with similar biological features and stages. Selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer can have an extremely good prognosis.
Methods
Among the 210 women with first primary invasive apocrine non metastatic breast cancer operated between January 1998 and December 2016 at European Institute Oncology, Milan, we identified 24 patients with pT1-pT2, node-negative, triple negative subtype and Ki-67 ≤20% who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the outcome of this cohort with a similar group of 48 patients with ductal tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by pathological stage and biological features (matching ratio 1:2).
Results
The median age was 63 and 50 years in the apocrine and ductal group, respectively. The mean value of Ki-67 expression was 12% in the apocrine group and 14% in the ductal group. 83% of apocrine tumors had size less than 2 cm, compared with 71% of ductal tumors. After a median follow-up of 6.6 years no patients in the apocrine group experienced a breast cancer related event compared with 12 events (including 5 loco-regional recurrences, 3 distant recurrences e 4 contralateral tumors) in the ductal carcinoma group (Gray test p-value=0.015).
Conclusions
The outcome of selected apocrine triple negative breast cancer patients is excellent and possibly deserves a treatment de-escalation. Multicenter projects focusing on the possibility to avoid adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subtypes of triple negative breast cancers with favorable outcome are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Cancello: Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre. E. Montagna: Honoraria (self): Pierre fabre; Honoraria (self): gentili. E. Munzone: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Genomic Health. S. Dellapasqua: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. M.A. Colleoni: Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: OBI Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Puma Biotechnology; Advisory / Consultancy: Celldex; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4250 - Phase II study of avelumab in combination with cetuximab as a rechallenge strategy in pre-treated RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: CAVE (cetuximab-avelumab) Colon.
Presenter: Erika Martinelli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5234 - The ORCHESTRA trial; A phase III trial of adding tumor debulking to systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone in multi-organ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Lotte Bakkerus
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5294 - EMERGE: Epigenetic Modulation of the Immune Response in Gastrointestinal cancers
Presenter: Elizabeth Cartwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
913 - Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APACT): subgroup analyses
Presenter: Margaret Tempero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1668 - FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma : update of the AGEO cohort.
Presenter: Edouard Auclin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2559 - Impact of adjuvant treatment with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) vs gemcitabine alone (GEM) on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients (pts) with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) in the Adjuvant Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (APACT)
Presenter: Hanno Riess
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4897 - Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using methylation signatures in circulating tumor DNA
Presenter: Xiao-ding Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1755 - Evaluation of minimal important difference (MID) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Pancreatic Cancer Module (PAN26) in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Michele Reni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2876 - Multispectral analysis of lymphocyte complexity in periampullary adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Sebastian Lundgren
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1902 - Phase II trial of preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) followed by postoperative gemcitabine (GEM) in patients (pts) with borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Jae Ho Jeong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract