Abstract 2280
Background
We compared the prognosis of patients with breast cancer according to surgical options including mastectomy with reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We also assessed the association between prognosis and surgical options according to clinical stage and clinical response in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods
A total of 140,712 patients were enrolled in the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry database between 2000 and 2014 in Korea. We compared the prognosis of three groups; 1) patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 2) patients who underwent mastectomy, and 3) patients who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction.
Results
Of all 6,634 patients who were treated with NAC, 1,745 patients underwent BCS, 1,459 patients underwent mastectomy, and 363 patients underwent mastectomy with reconstruction. In survival analysis, five-year survival rate (5YSR) of mastectomy with BR group was not inferior compare to other groups in clinical stage IIA and IIB. 5YSR of mastectomy with BR group was 100% and 90.0% clinical stage IIA and IIB, whereas 5YSR of mastectomy group was 97.2% and 86.2% (clinical stage IIA and IIB; P = 0.033 and 0.023). In clinical stage IIIA and IIIB, there was no significant difference in 5YSR between mastectomy with BR group and other groups. However, women who underwent mastectomy with BR had a worse prognosis compare to BCS or mastectomy group in clinical stage IIIC. In univariate analysis by Cox regression method according to surgical methods, women who underwent mastectomy with BR had a worse prognosis compared to other groups in patients with clinical stage IIIC (HR 5.88; 95% CI 2.17-15.89; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, women who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction followed by NAC were associated with a worse prognosis in clinical stage IIIC. (HR 3.41; 95% CI 1.29-8.99; P = 0.013).
Conclusions
In this study, women who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction followed by NAC were associated with a worse prognosis in the clinically advanced stage. This study suggests that reconstruction followed by NAC should be considered for appropriately selected patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3907 - Exploration of efficacious alternative regorafenib regimens to manage hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR)
Presenter: Axel Grothey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3958 - Quality of Life (QoL) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results of a European Survey
Presenter: Zorana Maravic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3563 - BISQUIT: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1184 - iSCORE: Immunotherapy Sequencing in COlon and REctal Cancer
Presenter: Fiona Turkes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3346 - Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA Study
Presenter: Lisa Salvatore
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3895 - A phase II study of capecitabine plus concomitant radiation therapy followed by durvalumab (MEDI4736) as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer: PANDORA study.
Presenter: Maria Aurelia Barbera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2012 - Open Label Phase III Study of Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin in mFOLFOX-6 for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AGENT
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2198 - SOLSTICE, a phase 3, randomized, open label study of trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (bev) versus capecitabine+bev for the 1L treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for intensive therapy
Presenter: Thierry Andre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2921 - A Phase Ib/ II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CXD101 in Combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic, Previously-Treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (short title CAROSELL)
Presenter: Mark Saunders
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3695 - A Phase 1b/2 Study of Onvansertib (PCM-075) in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a KRAS Mutation
Presenter: Heinz Josef Lenz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract