Abstract 4951
Background
Despite multiple retrospective studies have demonstrated the clinical validity of molecularly-guided therapy selection in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), none have validated the actual clinical utility in the context of a randomised controlled trial. We hypothesise that treatment decisions based on plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling will increase progression-free survival (primary endpoint), which would result in prolonged overall survival and improved quality-of-life (secondary endpoints).
Trial design
The Prostate Biomarker (ProBio) trial is a recently-initiated adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomized controlled biomarker driven phase 3 trial in men with mCRPC. Men (n = 750) will be randomized to receive either standard of care or an experimental treatment with abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, or carboplatin based on molecular biomarker signatures, as inferred from our liquid biopsy profiling. Therefor a prostate-specific1.48 Mb biomarker panel was designed and validated, which is capable of detecting 1) mutations in 78 genes, 2) genomic structural rearrangements in 11 prostate cancer-associated genes, 3) genome-wide copy number alterations, 4) 63 microsatellites to infer microsatellite instability, 4) tumour mutational burden and 5) estimate the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction. The initial pre-defined biomarker signatures are defined as tumour properties or mutations in certain genes/pathways identified in the scientific literature as potentially important in prostate cancer treatment response encompassing the androgen receptor (AR), TP53, DNA-repair deficiency (DRD) and the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. The statistical design of ProBio is novel, since the randomisation probabilities for a given experimental systemic therapy are subjective to change as the trial evolves and learns from prior experience. Secondly, ProBio implements a re-randomization of non-responding patients.
Clinical trial identification
2018-002350-78 (16/07/2018), NCT03903835 (29/03/2019).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ProBio Investigators.
Funding
The Swedish Research Council, The Erling-Persson Family Foundation, The Swedish Cancer Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract