Abstract 4951
Background
Despite multiple retrospective studies have demonstrated the clinical validity of molecularly-guided therapy selection in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), none have validated the actual clinical utility in the context of a randomised controlled trial. We hypothesise that treatment decisions based on plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling will increase progression-free survival (primary endpoint), which would result in prolonged overall survival and improved quality-of-life (secondary endpoints).
Trial design
The Prostate Biomarker (ProBio) trial is a recently-initiated adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomized controlled biomarker driven phase 3 trial in men with mCRPC. Men (n = 750) will be randomized to receive either standard of care or an experimental treatment with abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, or carboplatin based on molecular biomarker signatures, as inferred from our liquid biopsy profiling. Therefor a prostate-specific1.48 Mb biomarker panel was designed and validated, which is capable of detecting 1) mutations in 78 genes, 2) genomic structural rearrangements in 11 prostate cancer-associated genes, 3) genome-wide copy number alterations, 4) 63 microsatellites to infer microsatellite instability, 4) tumour mutational burden and 5) estimate the circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction. The initial pre-defined biomarker signatures are defined as tumour properties or mutations in certain genes/pathways identified in the scientific literature as potentially important in prostate cancer treatment response encompassing the androgen receptor (AR), TP53, DNA-repair deficiency (DRD) and the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. The statistical design of ProBio is novel, since the randomisation probabilities for a given experimental systemic therapy are subjective to change as the trial evolves and learns from prior experience. Secondly, ProBio implements a re-randomization of non-responding patients.
Clinical trial identification
2018-002350-78 (16/07/2018), NCT03903835 (29/03/2019).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ProBio Investigators.
Funding
The Swedish Research Council, The Erling-Persson Family Foundation, The Swedish Cancer Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract