Abstract 5543
Background
Evidence suggests that ATB and gut microbiota composition are associated to anti-PD-1 outcomes in RCC patients. Network analysis of the gut microbiota represents a novel tool to determine “guilds” of bacterial communities.
Methods
Here, we investigated guilds’ relationships with prior exposure to ATB, TKI [axitinib (axi), sunitinib (suni) or other] and clinical outcomes of RCC patients treated with nivolumab (nivo).
Results
Considering prior exposure to ATB (n = 11, 22%), axi (n = 13, 19%), suni (n = 49, 71%) or other TKI (n = 20, 29%), n = 36 (52%) patients were NR and 33 (48%) R to nivo. Cross-validation of overall fecal microbiota composition stratified RCC patients with different predictive power (ATB=84%; axi=81%; suni=69%; outcome=49%). Network analysis revealed six guilds (G1 to G6). G1-G2 behaved in an opposite way and topologically separated by negative correlations. G1-G2 were both related to NR, while G1 was dominated by species related to ATB. Conversely G2 was mainly represented by species related to no ATB (X2=8.98, P = 0.0027) and more susceptible to prior TKI exposure (where axi and suni behaved in an opposite way) compared to the other guilds (X2=10.68, P = 0.0011). G4 was mainly inhabited by species related to other TKI (no axi and no suni). Random forest analysis found definite bacterial species able to drive the stratification into guilds of the global RCC network, such as Akkermansia muciniphila for R and Dorea formicigenerans for no ATB.
Conclusions
We show that ATB and suni are the most powerful external features able to drive fecal microbiota compositional shifts in RCC patients treated with nivo. Analysis of the gut microbiota using bacterial communities guilds provides a novel theranostic approach to stratify RCC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Albiges: Honoraria (self): Novartis, BMS, Amgen, Ipsen, Roche, Pfizer, Astellas, Merck. K. Fizazi: Advisory / Consultancy: Participation to advisory boards/honorarium for: Astellas, AAA, Bayer, Clovis, Curevac, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Orion, Sanofi. B. Escudier: Advisory / Consultancy: IPSEN, BMS, AZ, Novartis, Roche, Oncorena. L. Zitvogel: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, AstraZeneca,; Research grant / Funding (self): Incyte, GSK, Transgene, Innovate Biopharma, Pilege; Advisory / Consultancy: Everimmune. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract