Abstract 4614
Background
Response to checkpoint inhibitors (CI) is governed by the tumor immune environment and understanding this immune contexture can predict response. Therapeutic intervention can change this environment even in the absence of clinical response. Patients failing initial immunotherapy may respond to a second line of CI; however, these cohorts show lower overall response rates (ORR). This study identifies transcriptional signatures associated with response to first- and second-line CI monotherapy in melanoma.
Methods
CI-naïve or ipilimumab-refractory patients were treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab at the Instituto Nazionale Tumori and clinical response was evaluated by irRECIST 1.1 criteria. Pretreatment tumor biopsies (n = 82) from metastatic lesions were collected and RNA was profiled with the NanoString® IO360 gene expression panel.
Results
Compared to CI-naïve cohorts, ipilimumab-refractory cohorts had reduced ORR to nivolumab (naïve: 35%, n = 6; refractory: 20%, n = 10) or pembrolizumab (naive: 67%, n = 6; refractory: 20%, n = 10) with multiple genes differentially expressed between groups. The Tumor Inflammation Signature, an investigational 18 gene signature of suppressed adaptive immune response enriching for pembrolizumab response, was higher in responders versus non-responders in first-line (log2 fold change: 1.56, p = 0.21), but not second-line pembrolizumab (log2 fold change: 0.41, p = 0.60). First-line pembrolizumab responders had elevated MHC2 (log2 fold change: 1.35, p = 0.02) and B cell (log2 fold change: 2.14, p = 0.02) signatures. Upon stratifying the CI-naïve cohort between no prior treatment versus prior targeted/chemotherapy, the latter had increased immune expression suggesting these therapies prime the tumor immune environment.
Conclusions
Correlating patterns of tumor gene expression with clinical response can lead to the development of biomarkers enriching for CI response in both first-line and CI-refractory patients. Utilization of a clinical grade platform such as the NanoString nCounter® may speed the development of diagnostic assays used to predict and monitor patient response to immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
NanoString Technologies.
Disclosure
S. Ong: Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. S. Warren: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. A. Cesano: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. J.M. Beechem: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. P.A. Ascierto: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: MedImmune; Advisory / Consultancy: IDERA; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Sandoz; Advisory / Consultancy: Syndax; Advisory / Consultancy: Sun Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Ultimovacs; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3047 - Health-related quality of life in Greek haematogical malignancies patients undergoing chemotherapy
Presenter: Maria Lavdaniti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1121 - Experiences of endocrine therapy after breast cancer surgery
Presenter: Susanne Ahlstedt Karlsson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2305 - The effects of progressive muscle relaxation and mindfulness meditation on fatigue, coping styles, and quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant paclitaxel regimen: An-assessor blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Zehra Gok Metin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4561 - Agreement between breast cancer patients and oncologists on the severity of patients’ symptoms and functions during a one-year follow-up after treatment.
Presenter: Randi Reidunsdatter
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1768 - Taste Changes and Associated Factors in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
Presenter: Gulcan Bagcivan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1830 - CART-19: a comparative between literature versus experience
Presenter: Cassandra Andersson Vila
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4027 - Unplanned emergency department use by people receiving ambulatory anti-cancer agents with potential febrile neutropenia
Presenter: Meritxell Casanovas-Blanco
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4754 - Examining the benefits of medical exercise during radiotherapy in patients after mastectomy
Presenter: Nikolina Dodlek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2510 - Assessment Quality of Life with Hand-Foot Syndrome Induced by Apatinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Therapy in NSCLC
Presenter: Qi Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2989 - Adverse effects of chemotherapy influence the patients’ quality of life : Analysis of implicated factors
Presenter: Maria Lavdaniti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract