Abstract 4614
Background
Response to checkpoint inhibitors (CI) is governed by the tumor immune environment and understanding this immune contexture can predict response. Therapeutic intervention can change this environment even in the absence of clinical response. Patients failing initial immunotherapy may respond to a second line of CI; however, these cohorts show lower overall response rates (ORR). This study identifies transcriptional signatures associated with response to first- and second-line CI monotherapy in melanoma.
Methods
CI-naïve or ipilimumab-refractory patients were treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab at the Instituto Nazionale Tumori and clinical response was evaluated by irRECIST 1.1 criteria. Pretreatment tumor biopsies (n = 82) from metastatic lesions were collected and RNA was profiled with the NanoString® IO360 gene expression panel.
Results
Compared to CI-naïve cohorts, ipilimumab-refractory cohorts had reduced ORR to nivolumab (naïve: 35%, n = 6; refractory: 20%, n = 10) or pembrolizumab (naive: 67%, n = 6; refractory: 20%, n = 10) with multiple genes differentially expressed between groups. The Tumor Inflammation Signature, an investigational 18 gene signature of suppressed adaptive immune response enriching for pembrolizumab response, was higher in responders versus non-responders in first-line (log2 fold change: 1.56, p = 0.21), but not second-line pembrolizumab (log2 fold change: 0.41, p = 0.60). First-line pembrolizumab responders had elevated MHC2 (log2 fold change: 1.35, p = 0.02) and B cell (log2 fold change: 2.14, p = 0.02) signatures. Upon stratifying the CI-naïve cohort between no prior treatment versus prior targeted/chemotherapy, the latter had increased immune expression suggesting these therapies prime the tumor immune environment.
Conclusions
Correlating patterns of tumor gene expression with clinical response can lead to the development of biomarkers enriching for CI response in both first-line and CI-refractory patients. Utilization of a clinical grade platform such as the NanoString nCounter® may speed the development of diagnostic assays used to predict and monitor patient response to immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
NanoString Technologies.
Disclosure
S. Ong: Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. S. Warren: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. A. Cesano: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. J.M. Beechem: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: NanoString Technologies. P.A. Ascierto: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Array; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: MedImmune; Advisory / Consultancy: IDERA; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Sandoz; Advisory / Consultancy: Syndax; Advisory / Consultancy: Sun Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Ultimovacs; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4868 - Evaluation of markers associated with efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients (pts) with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) from the LATITUDE study
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4837 - LRP2, a potential new biomarker for Chinese younger aged intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients
Presenter: Xiaoliang Shi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1286 - Reanalysis of the efficacy of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) given in the randomized trial SHIVA01 according to the ESMO ESCAT scale of actionability
Presenter: Aurelie Moreira
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2736 - Comparison of Platforms for Determining Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) From Blood Samples in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Jonathan Baden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5045 - Comprehensive Pan-Cancer analysis of somatic mutations in drug transporters to reveal acquired and intrinsic drug resistance in 3149 metastatic cancer patients
Presenter: Sander Bins
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4577 - Pan-Cancer Genomic Landscape of the Cyclin D1/FGF3,4,19 (11q13) Amplicon Including Associations with HPV Status, and ESR1 and AR Alterations
Presenter: Jennifer Johnson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5366 - Co-occurrence of NTRK fusions with other genomic biomarkers in cancer patients
Presenter: Xiaolong Jiao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4084 - Prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing on fine needle aspirations versus core needle biopsies in cancer patients included in SHIVA02 trial
Presenter: Julien Masliah-Planchon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6017 - First national External Quality Assessement for the interpretation of somatic variants: assessment of 25 variants in colorectal, lung, ovarian cancers and melanoma in France
Presenter: Etienne Rouleau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2283 - Prospective testing of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer facilitates clinical trial enrollment and precision oncology
Presenter: Andjelija Bujak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract