Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4331 - STING Agonist, ADU-S100, Yields Potent Antitumor Activity and Therapeutically Favorable Immune Profile in an Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Model
Presenter: Ali Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1770 - Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3755 - A new docetaxel (DOC)-based triplet regimen does not improve the outcome of metastatic (M) or locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer (GC) as compared with an epirubicin (EPI) standard triplet regimen: a GISCAD trial.
Presenter: Roberto Labianca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2439 - The analysis of T cell subsets and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades in patients with advanced gastric cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Tae-yong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2211 - First-line pembrolizumab (P), trastuzumab (T), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-positive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Presenter: Yelena Janjigian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3046 - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumor response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4628 - Gastric cancer screening in BRCA 2 gene mutation carriers: should it be recommended?
Presenter: Inês Oliveira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2127 - Interim analysis of an observational/translational study for nivolumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-08 (DELIVER trial)
Presenter: Yu Sunakawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2264 - Prediction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in Stage II/III gastric cancer treatment based on comprehensive gene expression analysis
Presenter: Masanori Terashima
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2444 - Assessing the clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA through longitudinal liquid biopsy sampling in Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Emma Ococks
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract