Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4410 - Mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRa)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab: Initial results from a Phase 1b study in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5077 - Response to Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) and Weekly Paclitaxel (wpac) in Platinum Resistant (PR) Ovarian Cancer (OC) by BRCA mutation status
Presenter: Louise Bremer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3483 - Impact of prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC): Sub-group analysis from a randomized, open-label study comparing trabectedin (T) and PLD versus PLD alone in ROC (ET743-OVC-3006)
Presenter: Bradley Monk
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5423 - OCTAVE - A phase I study of enadenotucirev, an oncolytic group B adenovirus, in combination with weekly paclitaxel in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer
Presenter: Iain McNeish
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1385 - Phase I study of low dose whole abdominal radiation therapy (LDWART) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (wP) for platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Natalie Ngoi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2090 - Phase 1b/2a study assessing the safety and efficacy of adding AL3818 (Anlotinib) to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in subjects with recurrent or metastatic endometrial, ovarian or cervical carcinoma
Presenter: David Miller
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1960 - Phase I Study of Intraperitoneal TRX-E-002-1 in Subjects with Persistent or Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: Three-month Follow-up Results of the Dose Escalation Phase
Presenter: Jermaine Coward
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4288 - Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ovarian cancer
Presenter: Mi Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3433 - Tumor Microvessel Density for predicting Nintedanib activity: data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Maud Villemin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3392 - Post-hoc analysis of the nintedanib exposure-response relationships in the CHIVA trial in advanced ovarian cancer: (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Skerdi HAVIARI
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract