Abstract 1196
Background
There is currently no circulating biomarker for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The use of adjuvant sunitinib for RCC after nephrectomy is controversial, and a biomarker could help to select the patients at highest risk for recurrence. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is overexpressed in RCC and its ectodomain can be detected in circulating plasma. We therefore investigated whether KIM-1 is associated with worse outcomes in patients with localized RCC after nephrectomy.
Methods
In the ECOG-ACRIN 2805 (ASSURE) trial, 1943 patients with resected high-risk RCC were randomized 1:1:1 to sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo. Post-nephrectomy baseline samples from 182 randomly selected patients (9.4% of the study population) was available for this post-hoc biomarker analysis. Samples were analyzed using a previously validated microbead-based assay. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for association between circulating KIM-1 and disease free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS). ROC analysis was performed to evaluate test characteristics for KIM-1 in predicting RCC recurrence within 6 months after nephrectomy.
Results
Higher KIM-1 levels were associated with worse DFS and OS after nephrectomy. This association remained independently significant after controlling for pathologic stage, sarcomatoid features, and Fuhrman grade (DFS: HR 1.20 per log increase in KIM-1, 95% CI 1.09-1.33, p < 0.001; OS: HR 1.27 per log increase in KIM-1, 95% CI 1.11-1.45, p < 0.001). These associations were independent of treatment arm. In Kaplan-Meier analysis using KIM-1 quartiles, higher quartiles of KIM-1 were associated with worse DFS and OS (log-rank p = 0.02 for both). Post-nephrectomy KIM-1 was a prognostic marker for disease recurrence within 6 months after nephrectomy (AUC 0.85).
Conclusions
Elevated plasma KIM-1 is associated with worse DFS and OS in patients with resected RCC, and therefore has potential as an adjuvant biomarker. Analysis of larger cohorts to confirm this association is underway.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00326898.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O’Dwyer, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs).
Funding
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers: CA180820, CA180794, CA180867, CA189859.
Disclosure
K.T. Flaherty: Officer / Board of Directors: Loxo Oncology; Officer / Board of Directors: Clovis Oncology; Officer / Board of Directors: Strata Oncology; Officer / Board of Directors: Vivid Biosciences; Advisory / Consultancy, Corporate Advisory Board: X4 Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy, Corporate Advisory Board: PIC Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Asana; Advisory / Consultancy: Adaptimmune; Advisory / Consultancy: Fount; Advisory / Consultancy: Aeglea; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Shattuck Labs; Advisory / Consultancy: Arch Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Tolero; Advisory / Consultancy: Apricity; Advisory / Consultancy: Oncoceutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Fog Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Checkmate, Boston Biomedical, Pierre Fabre, Cell Medica, and Debiopharm.: Others; Advisory / Consultancy: Neon Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Tvardi; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Verastem. V. Sabbisetti: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Patents on blood KIM-1 is a diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker of RCC: Other. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4543 - Long-term real-world (RW) outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with ipilimumab (IPI) and non-IPI therapies: IMAGE study
Presenter: Stéphane Dalle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4523 - Prognostic Factors for efficacy of Ipilimumab used after AntiPD1 and/or BRAF+MEK inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: an Italian Melanoma Intergroup study
Presenter: Riccardo Marconcini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3632 - Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 (IPI+PD1) in metastatic melanoma after acquired resistance to IPI+PD1 immunotherapy
Presenter: Adriana Hepner
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3732 - Clinicopathologic characteristics of immune colitis in melanoma patients treated with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 (IPI+PD1) and PD1 monotherapy.
Presenter: Kazi Nahar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5005 - Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands
Presenter: Michiel van Zeijl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5524 - Utilization of Real-World Data to Assess the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: D Scott Ernst
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5884 - Tumor mutational burden and response to PD-1 inhibitors: an analysis of 89 cases of metastatic melanoma.
Presenter: Léa Dousset
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3120 - Increase in S100B and LDH as early outcome predictors for non-responsiveness to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2157 - Immune status defined by molecular information layers predicts response to pembrolizumab treatment in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Guillermo Prado-Vázquez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract