Abstract 1866
Background
In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can be used to genotype tumors and track clonal evolution. We investigated the clearance of RAS mutated clones under chemotherapy pressure by ctDNA analysis in patients with a RAS mutated mCRC.
Methods
Patients with a RAS mutated tumour included in the prospective PLACOL study, were monitored for ctDNA. Analyzes were based on optimized targeted next generation sequencing and/or droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR). For plasma samples without detectable mutations, we tested the methylation status of WIF1 and NPY genes using methylation-ddPCR (met-ddPCR) to validate the presence of ctDNA.
Results
Among the 36 patients with positive plasma samples for RAS mutations at inclusion, 28 (77.8%) remained RAS positive at disease progression, and 8 (22.2%) became negative. Subsequent met-ddPCR for methylated markers showed that only 2 out of the 8 patients with RAS negative plasma had detectable ctDNA at progression. Therefore, only two samples among 36 were confirmed for clearance of RAS mutation in our series.
Conclusions
This study suggests that the clearance of RAS mutations in patients treated by chemotherapy for a RAS mutated mCRC is a rare event. Monitoring tumor mutations in plasma samples should be combined with a strict control of the presence of ctDNA. The therapeutic impacts of RAS clearance need to be further explored.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the Université Paris-Descartes, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), the Institut National du Cancer (INCA, n° 2009-1-RT-03-US-1 and 2009-RT-03-UP5-1), the Association pour la recherche contre le cancer (ARC, no. SL220100601375), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR Nanobiotechnologies; no. ANR-10-NANO-0002-09), the SIRIC CARPEM, the ligue nationale contre le cancer (LNCC, Program “Equipe labelisée LIGUE”; no. EL2016.LNCC/VaT) and Advanced Merieux Research Grant and canceropole funding (no. 2011-1-LABEL-UP5-2).
Disclosure
H. Blons: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. V. Taly: Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Raindance Technologies. W. Shu-Fang: Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier. S. Pernot: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre. P. Laurent-Puig: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. A. Zaanan: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Baxter; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5458 - Baseline characteristics from CLARINET FORTE: Evaluating lanreotide autogel (LAN) 120 mg every 14 days in patients with progressive pancreatic or midgut neuroendocrine tumours during a standard first-line LAN regimen.
Presenter: Philippe Ruszniewski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1234 - Analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade biomarker and immune infiltrates in Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Jia Zhang Xing
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1517 - Diabetes Is Associated With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Growth and Metastasis
Presenter: Zhiyao Fan
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2145 - Investigation of the reclassification of G1/G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by WHO 2017 classification
Presenter: Takahiro Yokose
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3134 - Treatment with somatostatin analogues after radiopeptide therapy
Presenter: Daria Handkiewicz Junak
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2191 - Safety and Tolerability of Surufatinib in Western Patients with Solid Tumors
Presenter: Erika Hamilton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3253 - The impact of tumour absorbed dosimetry with survival outcomes after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3581 - Opportunist and Serious Infections in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Everolimus: A Multicenter Study of Real World Patients
Presenter: Carine Mauro
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5374 - Establishment of Prognostic Nomogram Based on the Metastatic Lymph Nodes Ratio for Patients with Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumour
Presenter: yaobin lin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3951 - Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictive factor in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Presenter: Sofia Ferreira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract