Abstract 1866
Background
In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can be used to genotype tumors and track clonal evolution. We investigated the clearance of RAS mutated clones under chemotherapy pressure by ctDNA analysis in patients with a RAS mutated mCRC.
Methods
Patients with a RAS mutated tumour included in the prospective PLACOL study, were monitored for ctDNA. Analyzes were based on optimized targeted next generation sequencing and/or droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR). For plasma samples without detectable mutations, we tested the methylation status of WIF1 and NPY genes using methylation-ddPCR (met-ddPCR) to validate the presence of ctDNA.
Results
Among the 36 patients with positive plasma samples for RAS mutations at inclusion, 28 (77.8%) remained RAS positive at disease progression, and 8 (22.2%) became negative. Subsequent met-ddPCR for methylated markers showed that only 2 out of the 8 patients with RAS negative plasma had detectable ctDNA at progression. Therefore, only two samples among 36 were confirmed for clearance of RAS mutation in our series.
Conclusions
This study suggests that the clearance of RAS mutations in patients treated by chemotherapy for a RAS mutated mCRC is a rare event. Monitoring tumor mutations in plasma samples should be combined with a strict control of the presence of ctDNA. The therapeutic impacts of RAS clearance need to be further explored.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, the Université Paris-Descartes, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), the Institut National du Cancer (INCA, n° 2009-1-RT-03-US-1 and 2009-RT-03-UP5-1), the Association pour la recherche contre le cancer (ARC, no. SL220100601375), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR Nanobiotechnologies; no. ANR-10-NANO-0002-09), the SIRIC CARPEM, the ligue nationale contre le cancer (LNCC, Program “Equipe labelisée LIGUE”; no. EL2016.LNCC/VaT) and Advanced Merieux Research Grant and canceropole funding (no. 2011-1-LABEL-UP5-2).
Disclosure
H. Blons: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. V. Taly: Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Raindance Technologies. W. Shu-Fang: Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier. S. Pernot: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre. P. Laurent-Puig: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. A. Zaanan: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Baxter; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5747 - The routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high risk DCIS lesions is not justified
Presenter: Fanny Preat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1837 - Oncological impact of re-excision for positive margin status after breast conserving surgery in invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Kenjiro Jimbo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4347 - Pneumonitis and fibrosis after breast cancer radiation.
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2280 - Prognosis of mastectomy with reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study in Korean Breast Cancer Society
Presenter: Sungmin Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
804 - A negative prognosis of radiotherapy-induced lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Chang-ik Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2701 - Patient data to monitor clinical patterns in early and advanced breast cancer in Europe
Presenter: Francesco Giusti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1437 - A critical appraisal of quality indicators of breast cancer treatment in Belgium
Presenter: Didier Verhoeven
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1534 - Predictors of adherence among post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Phillip Blanchette
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4363 - Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study
Presenter: Emilia Montagna
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2679 - Baseline Quality of life (QoL) and chemotherapy related toxicities (CRT) in localized breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): the French multicentric prospective CANTO cohort study
Presenter: Idlir Licaj
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract