Abstract 1871
Background
Much of the work of a busy oncology day unit is undocumented, especially the work involved in phone triage during the working hours of 8am to 6pm. Phone calls from patients, their family doctors, palliative care teams, or from within the Hospital itself seeking advice form the majority of this aspect of the Specialist Oncology Nurse and Staff Nurses’ time. This project was performed to assess the nature of these calls and the broad advice given to the callers so that a dedicated Acute Review Specialist Oncology Nurse Clinic could be developed.
Methods
In conjunction with key oncology nurses and their medical oncologist colleagues a log to capture each answered call was developed. This centred on the date and time of the call, the source, the issue raised, the advice given, if advised to go to the Emergency Room the reason why, and other actions that were necessary. A form was completed per answered call, and collected at the end of the day. Data was recorded on a spreadsheet. All forms were annonymised with regard to patient identifiers. The forms were focused on whether the issue was successfully addressed within the day unit, the Hospital’s emergency room, the community services, or whether solely by the advice given over the telephone.
Results
A sample size of 252 incoming answered calls by the Oncology Nursing Staff to the Nurses’ station was analysed. Just over half these calls (52%) were made by patients/family members. Other calls related to internal questions such as from Interventional Radiology or other diagnostic areas of the Hospital (26%), pharmacies (7%), and family doctors (4%). The other 11% of calls were mainly from wards relating to advice on inpatients or seeking consults. Of the unwell patients calling for advice, near half (48%) were seeking advice on what action to take: stay at home or come to Hospital. 35% of patients were seeking either a new appointment or change in appointment date. The remaining 17% of patients were seeking non-emergency review by the medical oncology team.
Conclusions
This analysis of answered calls highlights the need for involvement of experienced oncology nurses in the triage of phone calls to a busy oncology day unit, and the need to develop an Acute Review Clinic, managed by an experienced oncology nurse specialist.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont Hospital Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5705 - External validation and longitudinal extension of the LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) for immunotherapy outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Presenter: Jakob Riedl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5758 - Changes of TCR Repertoire in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Nivolumab
Presenter: Martin Klabusay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1743 - Expression of MHC class I, HLA-A and HLA-B identifies immune activated breast tumors with favorable outcome
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas López
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2219 - Prognostic Significance of Tumor Tissue NeuGcGM3 Ganglioside Expression and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cell Count Monitoring in Patients Receiving Racotumomab Immunotherapy
Presenter: Necdet Üskent
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2996 - Evolution of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Objective Response Rate in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) patients after receiving immunotherapy
Presenter: Carlos Jiménez Cortegana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2110 - A Phase Ia/Ib trial of the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) human monoclonal antibody (mAb), CS1001, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas
Presenter: Lin Shen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3515 - Results from a randomised Phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety and antitumour activity of anti-PD-1 (MEDI0680)/anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) vs anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) alone in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: Martin Voss
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3566 - Pembrolizumab in Advanced Rare Cancers
Presenter: Aung Naing
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3567 - High clinical benefit rates of pembrolizumab in very rare sarcoma histotypes: first results of the AcSé Pembrolizumab study
Presenter: Jean-Yves Blay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2421 - Lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockade in advanced bile tract carcinoma.
Presenter: Jianzhen Lin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract