Abstract 913
Background
The primary APACT analysis showed no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) by blinded, independent radiologic review with nab-P/G vs G in patients (pts) with surgically resected pancreatic cancer (PC). However, investigator-assessed DFS (prespecified sensitivity analysis) and interim overall survival (OS; secondary endpoint) trended in favor of nab-P/G. Here, we report interim OS exploratory subanalyses.
Methods
Treatment-naive pts with histologically confirmed PC, macroscopic complete resection (R0/R1), CA 19-9 < 100 U/mL, and ECOG PS 0 or 1 were enrolled. Stratification factors included resection (R0/R1), lymph node (LN) status (positive [+]/negative), and geographic region. Pts were treated ≤ 12 weeks after surgery with nab-P 125 mg/m2 + G 1000 mg/m2 or G 1000 mg/m2 alone on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for 6 cycles. For the primary endpoint assessment, independent reviewers received only baseline clinical data and scans. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. Ten prespecified subanalyses were performed.
Results
866 pts were randomized. Median age was 64 y (range, 34–86); most were male (56%) and white (78%) and had ECOG PS 0 (60%), LN+ status (72%), and R0 resection (76%). At the original data cutoff (31 December 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 mo), median OS (interim) trended in favor of nab-P/G vs G (40.5 vs 36.2 mo; HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 - 0.996; nominal P = 0.045). Pts with poor characteristics had numerically longer median OS with nab-P/G vs G: 32.5 vs 27.0 mo in pts with R1 resection (n = 105 and 100) and 33.8 vs 28.9 mo in pts with LN+ status (n = 311 and 312). This is consistent with the median OS observed with nab-P/G vs G in pts whose tumors were < 1 mm to the closest margin (32.5 vs 29.7 mo; n = 114 and 112). Pts with both R1 resection and LN+ status had numerically longer median OS with nab-P/G vs G (30.7 vs 24.9 mo; n = 87 and 83).
Conclusions
Final OS data may clarify the role for adjuvant nab-P/G. Interim OS analyses suggest that continued investigation of adjuvant nab-P/G for pts with suboptimally resected PC or who may not tolerate FOLFIRINOX is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01964430.
Editorial acknowledgement
Rebecca Tweedell, MediTech Media, Ltd, funded by Celgene Corporation.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Celgene Corporation.
Disclosure
M.A. Tempero: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Inc., Advance Medical, Inc., BioPharm Communications, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Eisai, Inc., Ignyta, Inc., Pharmacyslics, LLC., Pharmcyte Biotech, Tocagen, Inc., Immunovia, CPRIT, AstraZeneca. M. Reni: Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene, Baxalta, Merck Serono, Helsinn; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Celgene, Baxalta, Merck Serono, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novocure, Halozyme, Novartis, Shire. H. Riess: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene, Roche, Shire; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene, Shire. E.M. O’Reilly: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene Corporation; Research grant / Funding (self): ActaBiologica, Agios, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BMS, Casi, Exelixis, Genentech, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Mabvax, Novartis, OncoQuest, Polaris Puma, QED, Roche. S. Krishnamurthi: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Research Funding: Taiho, CytomX, Regeneron, Celgene, AbbVie. P. Österlund: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Bayer; Celgene; Eisai; Lilly; Merck Serono; Roche; Sanofi; Servier/Shire; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Prime Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Celgene (Inst); Lilly (Inst); Merck Serono (Inst); MSD (Inst); Nordic Drugs (Inst); Roche (Inst); Sanofi (Inst); Servier (Inst); Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AbbVie, Pierre Fabre. M. Milella: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, EUSA Pharma. S. Siena: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen, Bayer, BMS, CheckmAb, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Roche-Genentech, and Seattle Genetics. J. Tabernero: Advisory / Consultancy, Personal Financial Interest: Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Genentech, Inc., Genmab A/S, Halozyme, Imugene Limited, Inflection Biosciences Limited, Ipsen, Kura Oncology, Lilly, MSD, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Merus, Molecular Part. E. Van Cutsem: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Lilly, Roche, Servier, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Ipsen, Merck, Merck KGaA, Servier, Bristol-Myers Squibb. P.A. Philip: Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene, Bayer, and Incyte; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche, Sanofi, and Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene Corporation. D. Goldstein: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene Corporation, Pfizer. J.D. Berlin: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene Corporation. M. Li: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. S. Ferrara: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. Y. Le Bruchec: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. D. McGovern: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. A. Biankin: Leadership role: Gene Forward Inc; Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene, AstraZeneca; Licensing / Royalties: Agilent; Honoraria (self): Celgene, AstraZeneca, Tusk, Astar; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celegene, AstraZeneca, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene, AstraZeneca, Tusk, Astar, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3608 - Prognostic impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Khalil SALEH
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2686 - Clinicopathological characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of breast cancer-related microangiopathic haemolytic anemia: a multicenter study
Presenter: Marion Alhenc Gelas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1565 - Metabolic tumor volume by 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Heekyung Ahn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4498 - Patient Preferences for breast cancer treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment from four European countries
Presenter: Thomais Konstantopoulou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1423 - Palbociclib plus fulvestrant as second- or later-line therapy for patients with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany: Interim results of the INGE-B phase 2 study
Presenter: Diana Lüftner
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2284 - Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt for CNS Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Clinical Outcomes Based on Intrinsic Subtype
Presenter: Hee Kyung Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4598 - Administration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer near the end of life: a population registry study
Presenter: Luisa Edman Kessler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5706 - Prognostic value of histological growth pattern in patients operated for breast cancer liver metastases
Presenter: Ali Bohlok
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1697 - Illness perceptions, quality of life and mood in metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Isabel Domingues
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1935 - Multidisciplinary Treatments Increases Overall Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Breast Cancer:An Analysis of 2010–2014 SEER Data
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract