Abstract 1428
Background
HER2 blockade in combination with chemotherapy (CT) remains the treatment of choice for patients with early HER2+ BC, irrespective of ER status. Patients with HER2+ early BC co-expressing ER may benefit from HER2 blockade in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) and new targeted agents. Elderly patients benefit from HER2 blockade as much as younger ones but they have higher risks of adverse events, mostly induced by the CT partner, making de-escalation of CT appealing. Recent data have elucidated cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) as key therapeutic targets functioning downstream of both ER and HER2 pathways suggesting CDK4/6 inhibitors like Pal may be ideal partners for ET in this context. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that a gene signature of functional loss of Retinoblastoma (RBsig) might predict sensitivity to CT vs CDK4/6i in ER+/HER2+ early BC. The TOUCH hypothesis is that neoadjuvant therapy with Pal + ET + dual HER2 blockade may be more active in patients with ER+/HER2+ RBsig LOW early BC while those with RBsig HIGH may require CT.
Trial design
TOUCH is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant trial. 144 patients ≥65 years with ER+/HER2+ primary BC will be randomized (1:1) to dual HER2 blockade (5 doses T+P) + either Pal (125 mg/d po; 21 of 28d x 4 cycles) + L (daily x 16 weeks), or Pac (80 mg/m2 iv, d1,8,15 q28 days x 4 cycles), before surgery. RBsig (HIGH vs LOW) will be determined centrally on mandatory pre-treatment biopsies. Baseline geriatric assessment includes G8, Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, Charlson comorbidity index. The primary objective is to explore the interaction between RBsig and treatment activity assessed by pathological complete response (pCR). Exact logistic regression will test RBsig by treatment interaction (2-sided a=.05) and estimate odds ratios (OR) for pCR. The sample size provides 86% power, assuming an overall pCR rate of 26%, and OR = 2.4 vs OR = 0.11 for RBsig LOW vs HIGH. Accrual began April 2019.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03644186.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Funding
Pfizer, Roche.
Disclosure
L. Biganzoli: Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Genomic Health; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genomic Health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. E. Brain: Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Roche; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: BMS; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Celgene; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Clinigen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Hospira; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Janssen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Mylan; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: OBI Pharma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Puma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Samsung. L. Malorni: Research grant / Funding (self), research funding and consulting fees: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5747 - The routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high risk DCIS lesions is not justified
Presenter: Fanny Preat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1837 - Oncological impact of re-excision for positive margin status after breast conserving surgery in invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Kenjiro Jimbo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4347 - Pneumonitis and fibrosis after breast cancer radiation.
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2280 - Prognosis of mastectomy with reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study in Korean Breast Cancer Society
Presenter: Sungmin Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
804 - A negative prognosis of radiotherapy-induced lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Chang-ik Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2701 - Patient data to monitor clinical patterns in early and advanced breast cancer in Europe
Presenter: Francesco Giusti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1437 - A critical appraisal of quality indicators of breast cancer treatment in Belgium
Presenter: Didier Verhoeven
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1534 - Predictors of adherence among post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Phillip Blanchette
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4363 - Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study
Presenter: Emilia Montagna
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2679 - Baseline Quality of life (QoL) and chemotherapy related toxicities (CRT) in localized breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): the French multicentric prospective CANTO cohort study
Presenter: Idlir Licaj
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract