Abstract 1398
Background
Eribulin is approved for treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer and previously treated, unresected liposarcoma. E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a prior phase 1 study was 1.4 mg/m2 Q3W or 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Methods
The primary objective was to determine MTD and compare the tolerability of higher (> prior) Q3W doses vs the prior Q2W dose. E7389-LF was administered (3 + 3 design) intravenously Q3W (day 1 of a 21-day cycle) and Q2W (days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) to solid tumor pts in Japan for which no alternative standard or effective therapy exists. Planned dose ranges were 1.0-2.5 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.0-1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Results
21 pts were enrolled; 3, 3 and 6 pts in 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W; 3 and 6 pts in 1.0 and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W, respectively. 10 pts were male, median age was 58 years (range, 22-68), and 11 had ECOG-PS 0. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W group (febrile neutropenia; n = 6); thus, 2.5 mg/m2 Q3W was not assessed. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (67%), leukopenia (48%), anemia (19%), increased ɣ-glutamyltransferase, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia (each 14%). The MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Partial response was noted in 4 pts (19%) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, urothelial cancer, and small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of total eribulin were higher and AUC of unbound eribulin in plasma lower with E7389-LF vs the standard dose of eribulin (Table).Table:
348P
Eribulin formulation/dose | Plasma AUC (h*ng/mL) of eribulin | |
---|---|---|
Total | Unbound | |
E7389-LF 1.0 mg/m2 | 26300 | 98.1 |
E7389-LF 1.5 mg/m2 | 34700 | 120 |
E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 | 39100 | 148 |
Standard eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 | 673 | 336 |
Conclusions
E7389-LF was well tolerated in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors with antitumor effects in several tumor types. Plasma AUC of eribulin after administration of E7389-LF suggested a promising exposure profile of the liposomal formulation in humans. The 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W regimen was recommended for further investigation in an expansion cohort of specific tumor types.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03207672.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Funding
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
N. Yamamoto: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, Lilly, Quintiles, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Takeda, Janssen Pharma, MSD, Merck; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai, Otsuka, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cimic. S. Iwasa: Research grant / Funding (institution), grants from Eisai, during the conduct of the study: Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly, Taiho, Chugai, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. A. Shimomura: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Chugai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Nippon Kayaku; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Eisai. S. Kondo: Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. K. Yonemori: Research grant / Funding (self), trail management at site: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Eisai. Y. Fujiwara: Research grant / Funding (institution): Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Merck Serono, Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Taiho, Sysmex, ONO, Novartis, MSD, Chugai, BMS, AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, ONO, AstraZeneca, BMS. T. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Millenium-Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, PharmaMar, 3D-Medicine, Symbio Pharmaceuticals, Chordia Therapeutics, Five Prime; Advisory / Consultancy: The Consortium on Harmonization of Institutional Requirements for Clinical Research (CHAIR) Joint Scientific Committee Review Member for Phase 1 trials in Hong Kong. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4732 - Progesterone Receptor Isoform Ratio Dictates Antiprogestins/Progestins Effects on Metastatic Breast Cancer Models
Presenter: Maria Abascal
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5737 - PAM50 and CGH-array genomic characterization of HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations.
Presenter: Carine Ngo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1096 - OncotypeDX® predictive nomogram for recurrence score output: a machine learning system based on quantitative immunochemistry analysis - ADAPTED01
Presenter: Fabio Marazzi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5426 - Geriatric parameters predict both disease-related and patient-reported outcomes in older patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Willeke van der Plas-Krijgsman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5865 - Patients with a 21-gene assay in South East London differ from the TAILORx trial population
Presenter: Charalampos Gousis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1312 - Predictive tools in adjuvant breast cancer – what is the standard of evidence supporting their utility? A literature review examining validation of Adjuvant!, Cancermath and NHS Predict
Presenter: Alice Loft
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2445 - Oncologic outcome of invasive lobular carcinoma: Is it different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma?
Presenter: Hee Jun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2476 - Pathologic response and survival efficacy in patients with initial nodal involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
Presenter: SERAFIN MORALES Murillo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3761 - Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: prognostic impact on premenopausal Egyptian patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Khaled Abdel Karim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4687 - Predicting the presence of breast cancer using circulating small RNA in the serum
Presenter: Yumiko Koi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract