Abstract 3457
Background
With immunotherapy (IO) being the standard of care in melanoma, over time this has led to pressures within the medical day unit (MDU), especially as other cancer algorithms have evolved incorporating IO. Main pressures include reduced capacity, increasing patient numbers leading to greater pressure on doctors and requiring greater consultation time with patients to discuss survivorship issues. To help address these issues a pharmacist and nurse (P/N) led clinic was created as a new model of care in 2017.
Methods
Melanoma patients prescribed IO are placed into the clinic and reviewed 2-4 weekly as per IO regimen. Doctors review patients 12 weekly in outpatients for scan results. To assess the benefit of the clinic the number of referrals made back to the doctor before 12 weeks were recorded. Consultations needing >10 mins to discuss survivorships issues and P/N interventions were recorded.
Results
36 patients (age 24-89 yrs) have been referred to the clinic; 33 needed IO treatment, 2 steroid weaning and 1 temozolomide patient, needing nursing support. All patients required clinical evaluation for consideration of next cycle. Doctor’s input was required for 4 patients; 2 for inpatient admission for IO toxicity (monitoring for adrenal insufficiency, diabetic ketoacidosis), 1 for a biopsy (new skin nodule), 1 (scan results). Interventions routinely made by P/N included referrals to surgeons (3), dermatologist (2), ophthalmologist (2), tissue viability nurse (2), lymphedema team (2), physiological support (2) and fitness instructor (2). All patients required survivorship support and consultations ranged from 15-45 min. Common themes which emerged included how to partake in physical activity, anxiety on stopping IO, financial burden and advice on complementary therapies. In the melanoma team patients stop IO at 2yrs. Discussion on stopping IO is explored within 3 months of stopping IO; this discussion has occurred in 18/33 patients, in which the P/N helped alleviate patient’s anxiety over this time.
Conclusions
The clinic has become embedded within the melanoma service and has helped improve MDU pressures by removing patients requiring greater holistic support. This clinic in turn has sought out survivorship issues important to melanoma patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1908 - Androgen Receptor (AR) Aberrations in Patients (Pts) With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC) Treated With Apalutamide (APA) Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in TITAN
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4058 - 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
Presenter: Anouk de Jong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2226 - Spatial-Temporal Change in Quantitative Total Bone Imaging (QTBI) and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Treated With Enzalutamide (ENZA)
Presenter: Glenn Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5795 - Efficacy of Enzalutamide in Hormone-sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Clinical Utility of 18F-Choline PET and Whole Body MRI.
Presenter: Susanne Osanto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
899 - Urine extracellular vesicle GATA2 mRNA alone and in a multigene test predicts initial prostate biopsy result
Presenter: Jungreem Woo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3094 - Circulating tumor cell (CTC) genomic landscape in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) by single cell copy number analysis
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2527 - Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) count and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response measures in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Docetaxel (Doc)
Presenter: Rebeca Lozano Mejorada
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6106 - Assessing the clinical relevance of drug–drug interactions (DDI) with darolutamide (DARO)
Presenter: Christian Zurth
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2237 - KEYNOTE-921: phase 3 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus docetaxel and prednisone for enzalutamide (enza)- or abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2241 - KEYNOTE-641: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Enzalutamide for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Julie Graff
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract