Abstract 5908
Background
Gastric and GEJ cancers are one of the top four cancers in India with poor 5-year survival. Post ASCO 2017, we switched to docetaxel-based peri-operative chemotherapy (FLOT) which is the new standard of care. In this audit, we report the pathological response and toxicity of FLOT compared to our older standard (EOX/ECF).
Methods
We analysed our database of 118 patients with gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated at our center from May 2011 to April 2019. 85 patients (72%) received perioperative chemotherapy with three pre-operative and three post-operative 3-week cycles of either EOX (50mg/m2 Epirubicin and 130mg/m2 Oxaliplatin on Day 1 plus 1250mg/m2 Capecitabine for 21 days) or ECF (50mg/m2 Epirubicin and 60mg/m2 Cisplatin on Day 1 plus 800mg/m2/day Fluorouracil as continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days). 33 patients (28%) received four pre-operative and four post-operative 2-week cycles of intravenous FLOT (50mg/m2 Docetaxel, 85mg/m2 Oxaliplatin, 200mg/m2 Leucovorin and 2600mg/m2 Fluorouracil as 24hr infusion on Day 1). We compared the toxicity, and pathological tumor response rates of patients on EOX/ECF and FLOT regimens.
Results
The patients were aged 30 to 73 years (Median 58 years) and 40 (34%) were women. 85 patients received either EOX/ECF and 33 received FLOT chemotherapy. 64 (75%) patients in EOX/ECF underwent gastrectomy among whom eight (12.5%) had pathological Tumour Regression Score (TRS) of 0 or 1. 24 (72%) patients in FLOT group have undergone gastrectomy of whom six (25%) had TRS of 0 or 1. 34 (40%) patients completed full EOX/ECF regimen while 20 (60%) completed full FLOT. The commonest reason for not completing the peri-operative chemotherapy was toxicity in EOX/ECF group (29%) and refusal to undergo surgery (21%) in the FLOT group. 15% patients did not complete FLOT chemotherapy due to toxicity.
Conclusions
FLOT regimen is a better tolerated perioperative therapy in Indian patients achieving higher pathological response compared to EOX/ECF regimen. The patients in both groups are currently on follow up to capture the relapse free survival duration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tanuj Chawla.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract