Abstract 3635
Background
Surgery alone is not sufficient to achieve satisfactory prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), and perioperative therapies have been proposed to improve survival outcome. However, the optimal modality and regimen of perioperative chemotherapy are yet to be identified. This study compared the efficacy and safety of SOX as perioperative chemotherapy versus SOX or XELOX as postoperative chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy in patients with LAGC.
Methods
The RESOLVE Trial is a three-arm, randomized, multicenter, open-label phase III trial. Patients with stage cT4a/N+M0 or cT4bNxM0 gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled. All patients received standard gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Arms A and B respectively received 8 cycles of adjuvant XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, bid, d1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, d1, q3W) or SOX (TS-1: 40-60 mg bid, d1-14, oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2 d1, q3W). Arm C received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant SOX and 5 cycles of adjuvant SOX followed by 3 cycles of TS-1. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rate (3yDFS%) in the mITT population.
Results
A total of 1094 patients were randomized between 08/2012 and 02/2017, 364/365/365 in arm A/B/C, and 454 recurrences/deaths were observed by 07/2019. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms (overall, male 75.2%; median age 60.0 years; GEJ 36.5%). Peri-operative SOX improved 3yDFS% compared with post-operative XELOX (3yDFS%, 62.0% in Arm C, 54.8% in Arm A; HR 0.79, 95%CI [0.62-0.99]; p = 0.045). Post-operative SOX was non-inferior to post-operative XELOX (3yDFS%, 60.3% in Arm B, 54.8% in Arm A; HR 0.85, 95%CI [0.67-1.07]; p = 0.162). Resection rate was 90.4% in Arm A, 92.7% in Arm B, and 85.5% in Arm C, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate was all 0.9% for Arms A, B and C.
Conclusions
Perioperative SOX is superior to post-operative XELOX while post-operative SOX is non-inferior to post-operative XELOX for LAGC after D2 gastrectomy. It provides the evidence of perioperative SOX in LAGC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01534546.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2111 - Phase III randomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with docetaxel(D), oxaliplatin(O) and S-1(S) (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1, vs surgery and adjuvant S-1, for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC) (PRODIGY)
Presenter: Yoon-Koo Kang
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA41 and LBA42
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
4088 - Randomized phase 3 ANGEL study of rivoceranib (apatinib) + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo + BSC in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer who failed _2 prior chemotherapy regimens
Presenter: Yoon-Koo Kang
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
6259 - Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced G/GEJ Cancer (GC) Including Outcomes According to Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Status in KEYNOTE-062
Presenter: Kohei Shitara
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA43 and LBA44
Presenter: Kei Muro
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast